Do you agree with following order of companies formulated using levels.fyi for compensation? 0 Airbnb 1 LinkedIn 2 Lyft 3 Netflix 4 Facebook 5 Google 6 Uber 7 Amazon = Apple 8 Microsoft Comment your corrections.
Agreed. For higher levels, it should be then: fb, goog, amzn, apple, msft and then as you pointed out. But there are not enough reports to assert it.
How high? I heard L6 at Airbnb pays a lot, more than fb e6. Also according to levels.fyi, LinkedIn senior staff get more than 700k, way more than fb E6, while the level is mapped lower than E6. So I wonder why
Snap should be first ๐
Snap was first, but then it disappeared ๐
Tableau offer
What's your methodology? If all you did is arrange them in descending order by the average TC of their first level, that's probably not really right.
Direct comparison in levels.fyi
Yes but how exactly? I tried to replicate what I think you did - the naive way I just explained - and I think it's suspect. For one thing, some companies pay very competitively at one level but not so much at others. For another, some companies' levels don't actually map to where levels.fyi thinks they do.