Do you support this 3rd trimester abortion stuff that's going around?

Dropbox 99+
Jan 30 54 Comments

TC 290

166 VOTESSELECT ONLY ONE ANSWER
VOTEVIEW RESULT

comments

Want to comment? LOG IN or SIGN UP
TOP 54 Comments
  • This comment was deleted by original commenter.

    • Oscar / OtherTender
      Why are you so defensive and mad? Jesus. Period today?
      Jan 30
    • Google trolDtrols
      So child support should be optional according to you ?
      Jan 30
    • Microsoft gonfishin
      If a kid can live on its own...it’s alive and an infant.

      Not hard.
      Jan 30
    • Microsoft 👖onGround
      Ya! It’s noble what you’re saying; however a bit pedantic. (Not sarcasm/or an attack)

      A baby can be delivered at the third trimester that can be healthy. The minute it exits the womb, it’s no longer a fetus... so what really is the difference between a name at this point.
      Jan 30
    • Microsoft gonfishin
      Yes they do! Every single person ever who has ever posted a selfie 🤳 with that ultrasound photo says “we’re pregnant! Here’s our sweet baby!”

      To loving parents, it’s a child from the moment you pee on a stick and it says positive.

      Having an abortion is no different than drowning your kids in the bathtub, it requires the same logic track to justify the deed to yourself.
      Jan 30
    • Microsoft 👖onGround
      Your definition according to goog is wrong. Infant is less than 365 days old.

      Youre using the wording to make a moot point.
      Jan 30
    • Oscar / OtherTender
      Gonfishin nailed it
      Jan 30
    • Microsoft gonfishin
      Ok fair, I’m a little sensitive that people don’t think an unborn child is a human being.
      Jan 30
    • Microsoft gonfishin
      That specific word “infant” probably yes.

      I think most people refer to it as “baby”

      “Oh here honey, feel the baby kick”

      “The baby likes it when you sing to her”

      “Hey, this isn’t a great time for a baby, maybe we should kill it and try again when it’s more convenient for all of us?”
      Jan 30
    • Microsoft 👖onGround
      No, I don’t agree; and it makes no difference. You’re using a name to dehumanize a baby so it doesn’t sound as horrible. Abortion vs infanticide at this point could be 5 minutes apart.

      I mean, continuing the logic of aborting it 5 minutes before delivery, would it still be ok to dump the baby in the garbage bin after it was born with in a few minutes?

      This law is so twisted.
      Jan 30
  • Apple JobsAtApp
    Only if health of mother is at risk. I think 6 months is enough to decide.
    Jan 3011
    • Nvidia zVEC05
      The laws allow for “health” but mean it in the broadest possible terms. Will having the baby make her sad/anxious, that qualifies as endangering her mental health so minutes before birth they can still kill the baby.

      “Life” & “health” are two different standards. When it comes to life endangerment all but the most hard core prolifer’s will allow that.
      Jan 30
    • Fiat Chrysler xcleet
      I totally agree with your point of view
      Jan 30
    • Apple JobsAtApp
      @amazon - please read what I said. If health of mother or baby is at risk then yes do abortion otherwise no in 3rd trimester.
      Jan 31
    • Apple JobsAtApp
      By health I mean life or death or long term disability. Doctors are very aware of those things. Mother is not doctor. She had her chance. Now she can give up baby for adoption. No one says she has to raise it.
      Jan 31
    • Apple JobsAtApp
      She can control for 6 months. If you took decision to stick till 6 months then finish the job. It’s not like I m taking away her rights. Anyways she can give birth and give up the baby.
      Jan 31
    • Apple JobsAtApp
      Anyways someone asked on blind. I m giving my opinion. You are welcome to ignore. Most of blinders are agreeing with me as you can see in the poll.
      Jan 31
    • Apple JobsAtApp
      Can you give me example of serious problem which mother would know but doctor won’t?
      Jan 31
    • Apple JobsAtApp
      Why are you not listening. If life threatening stuff happens it should abort. 100%. Without doubt. Life of mother >>>> life of unborn child.
      Jan 31
    • Apple JobsAtApp
      Child birth carries risk. But family are well aware of that in first trimester. They know what risk of baby birth is right away. On top of that if risk changes in 3rd trimester then yes mother should be protected. Outside of that we don’t have to agree. I respect your opinion.
      Jan 31
    • Apple JobsAtApp
      Although I agree there should be no need for law here either way.
      Jan 31
  • Google / Engbach
    Mother's life takes precedence over unborn baby's life, if you must choose due to Mom's medical condition. How is this even a question for anyone?
    Jan 302
    • Microsoft DangerRngr
      This! Thank you for stating the obvious.
      Jan 31
    • LinkedIn URFired
      But this is not the law is written. The law in VA says as long as mother wants (regardless her healthy condition), the mother can abort the infant.
      Feb 10
  • Google / Engligma🐔
    In your case op I'm in favor of 4th trimester abortions
    Jan 305
    • Microsoft gonfishin
      Supporters of legal homicide (abortion) often are OK with all forms of homicide.

      It doesn’t surprise me you are advocating for homicide.
      Jan 30
    • Microsoft Big Pun
      Strangely “pro lifers” also support homicide in the form of death penalty.
      Jan 30
    • Microsoft gonfishin
      Homicide can be justified.

      Abortion isn’t one of those times. An unborn child is by definition innocent and doesn’t deserve to die for any reason.

      So yes you’re right, I support homicide to prevent another homicide of innocent life. I also believe in castle law so defending your home against an invasion. I believe that to be justified homicide.

      I also believe for the worst humans on the planet, perhaps those that commit mass acts of violence or egregious sexual assault. We can legally take that persons life on the form of the death penalty.
      Jan 31
    • Google / Engligma🐔
      "have you ever noticed the people who are against abortion are people you wouldn't want to fuck in the first place?" - George Carlin

      Also if you're for killing those who commit egregious sexual assault you'd be killing all of your Catholic priest brothers! Are you sure you want to go down that path?
      Jan 31
    • LinkedIn URFired
      4th trimester starts at the moment the baby is born...
      Feb 10
  • Oracle / Legal
    not_larry

    OracleLegal

    BIO
    Not CTO
    not_larrymore
    But health...
    Jan 300
  • Google / Engbach
    There is no discrete point where a developing thing becomes a human entitled to full rights. It's continuous and therefore all arbitrary based on each person's beliefs. Some people think it's wrong to "spill" semen even, while there are others who think it's ok to kill a born child (some cultures have frequently killed female infants in particular). So given the spectrum of diverse belief in USA culture today, where does society decide to draw the line? Gotta have some compromise
    Jan 303
    • Microsoft gonfishin
      A fertilized egg seems like the logical point.
      Jan 30
    • Microsoft VotedWFeet
      Why is that a logical point? And not the moment when the child is actually born?

      If you think a fertilized egg is an human, so do you then support eggs getting treated as dependents? Getting US citizenship at fertilization? And all other rights like a human?
      Jan 30
    • Microsoft gonfishin
      It already is a US citizen at fertilization if it’s mother or father is a US citizen.

      It theoretically could be treated as a dependent. You’re spending money supporting it.
      Jan 31
  • This comment was deleted by original commenter.

    • Microsoft gonfishin
      It’s hard not to get emotional when a tiny little baby is getting cut up by scissors ✂️.

      Although I do agree accurate terminology should be used.

      A human being starts when an egg is fertilized by a sperm. Conception = life

      And taking a life = homicide

      Abortion = legal homicide

      Question is - are the reasons given to justify legal homicide enough to keep abortion legal?

      I argue, absolutely no.
      Jan 30
    • Microsoft gonfishin
      I’ll play.

      I’m well aware that our country doesn’t recognize our most vulnerable population - unborn infants in the law like it should. However, the law does take into affect that when a pregnant woman is murdered, it’s a double homicide. The law at one point and still does recognized an unborn child as a valuable. The only difference I see between homicide and abortion is intent.

      But all the same it’s homicide.

      Let’s use another analogy. Rape is illegal sex. While legal sex is consensual. Same act, intent makes the difference.
      Jan 31
    • Microsoft gonfishin
      I agree with that.

      The debate is whether abortion should still be considered legal homicide or not.

      I find it equivalent to a discussion on whether you should be able to commit homicide if somebody trespasses on your property.
      Jan 31
    • Microsoft gonfishin
      Do you really feel there’s no scientific evidence that a person is a person?

      I understand what you’re saying here, but it’s awful, and a slippery slope. This is how I could justify a mass murder, if you dehumanize it so far.

      Conception is when a new life is successfully forming. Lots of science and biology to confirm.
      Jan 31
    • Microsoft gonfishin
      You’re being childish and playing with words trying to act all smart.

      Conception is the first time that both an egg and a sperm have successfully created a new life and have started creating a new unique human. It’s basic biology, which is science.

      Whatever you want to call it, why would we kill it?
      Feb 1
  • New 00113
    If the mother’s health is at risk or the baby is not viable.
    Feb 10
  • Microsoft Desitechie
    Any serious threat to life of mother would qualify
    Some morally twisted people try to use issues like mother being depressed over having a kid as dangers to Mom's health
    Jan 310
  • Oath zxzxx
    Only yes / no choices? This is a black and white fallacy setup.
    Jan 310
  • Google / Engbach
    As for birthing a baby months earlier than the due date, now that's a tough ethical question. What if it is so underdeveloped that it will require support for life and not have full faculties or senses? Especially since you are bringing this baby to a family already facing extreme hardship (pregnancy was endangering mom's life after all, maybe she needs treatment for cancer etc)
    Jan 300
  • Microsoft Desitechie
    Do you think it is okay to kill the baby just as it is about to be delivered?
    If no, then no to this law!
    Exception in cases of real concerns of serious health problems to Mom or child.
    Jan 301
  • State exploiting mothers love for their children again?
    Feb 20
  • Microsoft Big Pun
    What happens to the baby if its parents don’t have health insurance and it gets sick? Fuck em tho right?
    Jan 300
  • PayPal lGTy66
    Nice deflection. While the intelligence chiefs accuse Trump of treason.
    Jan 300
  • Microsoft Big Pun
    “Going around”. You mean only on Fox News while everyone else is concerned with bigger issues?
    Jan 300

Join verified employees in our anonymous social network!Download the app!

close