I am an Indian. I have a few questions: 1. Was our air strike successful? If so, why isn’t the proof going out? I have heard it can risk a war but Pak seems to be shameless with Abhinandan’s video as well. 2. We knew Pak would attack. Even then how tf did we lose our wing commander? If MiG jets are not better than F16s, why did we not use our best jets for defense? Why did our pilot cross the loc? 3. They released our commander. That’s a geneva convention. How is this a peace gesture? (No hate comments. Only comment if you have some perspective. Please keep your discussions logical.) Jai Hind.
Sure. As a gesture of quid pro quo, we must also stuff all the F16s and other weapons, in these Altantic bas****s arse.
Seeing the last two comments, I don’t think I’ll get a decent answer here. I’ll delete the post if I continue to see spam
1 the missiles used penetrate inside building and trigger to achieve maximum damage inside (they need programming and dont destroy building itself) Read about it so it is difficult to find damage from images Area is cordoned off by army 2 good aircrafts are inside the country for their protection There are other anti aircraft missiles at border Its difficult to know exact loc from air plus after crash wind direction can take flight in certain direction for miles 3 true but it's what media prints
1. I think the proof might have been shared with other countries and diplomatic channels that matter and not the media, maybe because to avoid the risk of blowing cover of the secret intelligent sources. There was an image in the media, which showed flags of US, UK and Israel painted on the ground. That might be a bit of evidence. 2. I guess, we didn't know the medium and route of attack so the better jets might have been deployed somewhere else, in some other capacity, to be ready to respond to some other hostility. The pilot crossed the line as his craft got hit, so he ejected and landed on the other side. 3. I guess they could have not released him or ill treated him and that might have been a declaration of war, as per the Geneva Convention. But, they chose to release soon over any other hostility or provocation, so it may be seen as a more peaceful choice.
Makes sense, thank you
Imo, India didn’t achieve much. Looks like Indian strike didn’t do much damage. It came to back foot since its pilot was captured and plane got shot down. In another incident, Indian chopper got into mechanical failure and 5 jawans died. Pakistan still didn’t release Masoor and Hafeez. So overall, India showed intent but lacked capability. India is clearly not war-ready and can’t fight on both fronts (China and Pakistan) at the same time. Modi’s personal ambitions left India’s weak points exposed.
1- no, they were terribly unsuccessful. 2- because they thought, it will come back same as first time. Underestimating others. 3- how much Geneva convention in really followed now a days in the wars ? Even then, countries have so many ways to manipulate it. It didn’t happen so It was peace act and good gesture .
I’ll answer your 2nd question. There are different kinds of aircraft but for this question, we can assume there are two kinds - a) one which are light, can be started fast and can chase the enemy and drive them out. b) heavy but accurate. Can carry heavy payloads and go deep in enemy territory, strike and hopefully come back before the enemy reacts. Among our current aircrafts, mig21 falls in (a) and everything else in (b). We are hoping tejas would materialize soon and phase out mig21. Until then, that’s all we’ve got.
What about Su30MKI?
Lol. But No.
Tech Industry
13h
2146
Go woke, go broke: Google fires 28 employees involved in pro-Hamas protest
Tech Industry
Yesterday
43287
Goog Employees Arrested
Tech Industry
Yesterday
538
Since so many layoffs are going on, so this poll
Cars
Yesterday
1618
Why are Americans obsessed with SUV?
Layoffs
Yesterday
34430
Google CFO confirms "large-scale" layoffs today (Apr 17)
LoL, who the genius you expect in blind to answer you ?? FYI: Indian here too.