As for collusion and Russia Meuller put that one to bed. We should all be happy about that right? Otherwise what is the remedy for dealing with treason, the death penalty? Let's not downplay the severity of the accusations. Thankfully it was bunk. Lastly what is this bizarre relationship that ties conventional mainstream media/journalists the Democrat party and intelligence agencies fbi/CIA. Should we all be worried about a different form of collusion? How different from Iraq WMD's is this really? https://theintercept.com/2019/04/18/robert-mueller-did-not-merely-reject-the-trumprussia-conspiracy-theories-he-obliterated-them/
No. The democrats aren’t at all happy with this. Now they’ll need to come up with even less plausible smears against President Donald J. Trump.
👏 libtards will keep lying and spreading toxic narratives though.
His campaign took the Russian help. It's well documented. However there was not much evidence for blatant collusion . Check Trump's answer to Muller questions. I know tribal mentality is not going to make anyone impartial but I tried anyway :) people see what they wanna see. Last I heard Hillary is still crooked .
Read and learn, this is fact checked journalism not wishful “we believe all survivors” crap: The key fact is this: Mueller – contrary to weeks of false media claims – did not merely issue a narrow, cramped, legalistic finding that there was insufficient evidence to indict Trump associates for conspiring with Russia and then proving their guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. That would have been devastating enough to those who spent the last two years or more misleading people to believe that conspiracy convictions of Trump’s closest aides and family members were inevitable. But his mandate was much broader than that: to state what did or did not happen. That’s precisely what he did: Mueller, in addition to concluding that evidence was insufficient to charge any American with crimes relating to Russian election interference, also stated emphatically in numerous instances that there was no evidence – not merely that there was insufficient evidence to obtain a criminal conviction – that key prongs of this three-year-old conspiracy theory actually happened. As Mueller himself put it: “in some instances, the report points out the absence of evidence or conflicts in the evidence about a particular fact or event.”
Nice copy paste but you can actually read in Muller report how Trump answered his questions. Then it will make sense to you how it was "insufficient" . Also cover up and obstruction is equally messed up. But if you elected him given the incompetent dirt bag he was this would be a small change.
My favorite takeaway was basically that he would have obstructed justice had his staff followed orders: while plotting a crime is not a crime it shows he’s not the sharpest tool in the shed.
His own worst enemy and for what? All because of his complete lack of discipline.
Yep sadly though conservatives think he’s totally exonerated and liberals think impeachment should have happened yesterday. Time will tell if swing voters are truly paying attention and will vote this idiot out. As a left leaning voter he could be to the left of FDR and I’d still give him the boot.
The bottom line of the report is that there was a lot of collusion of the campaign with russians, and obstruction if justice as well, but collusion itself is not a crime and it is not clear if obstruction was enough to be a crime. It never debunks Russian collusion. what are you smoking?
They knew very early on the investigation only started bc of bullshit opposition funded dossier. Ask yourself why knowing there was no collusion, investigation still continued? Was it to wait for midterm elections to manipulate the result ?
Where’s jussi Smollett when you need him?
You know that Glen Greenwald is a Russian asset and stooge right?
Is that what we call all indepdendents and critical thinkers these days?
anons2 I think this line of reasoning is simply an extension of godwins law. Everyone I disagree with is a Russian agent.