Women at Nike were frustrated by a toxic work environment, sexual harassment and blunted career paths. They did not see HR penalizing bad behavior. Women self-organized and put together a survey, the results of which finally led to Nike addressing bad behavior. There is a similar situation at my large, global company- and a group of women are discussing the survey approach as a way to get management’s attention. Does anyone have the Nike survey questions or understand how they structured, and distributed the survey? Was it anonymous, or confidential and validated through employee record (current/former email)? Any insights from Nike employees would be appreciated.
lol this is clearly a reporter
You are clearly making a false assumption based on zero knowledge. Maybe you shouldn’t rush to judgement. This topic area is for people to share information and support each other on sensitive and challenging issues. If you have a problem with that and/or your immediate reaction is to discount and minimize people sharing and asking questions, maybe you should invest your time elsewhere.
Jesus, calm down dude
Hi there, OP. I do think the Nike approach is the most effective I’ve seen so far, and I hope it works for you. (My own attempts to get CEO action on a serious problem failed miserably.) I looked in my alumni network and found one senior Nike woman. I don’t know her personally. I assume you’re all trying your own networks to find a contact? If you don’t find someone, I’d be happy to try the contact I found. You can DM me if you prefer.
Can someone please post them? I work for a startup and they are covering up a lot of sexual harassment which has ocurred.
India
Yesterday
1600
Lost respect for Modiji
Tech Industry
Yesterday
344
Chances of meta clearing E5 with screwing up one coding one round and acing all other
Tech Industry
Yesterday
5243
Google doing more layoffs, restructuring including country moves
Tech Industry
2d
51706
Goog Employees Arrested
2024 Tax
Yesterday
2573
Biden’s new tax proposal is wild
How can validation occur on an anonymous survey?
In the likely scenario anonymous just means they didn’t collect names but controlled for sample / population. So validation isn’t hindrance on knowing who took the survey. In all likelihood they aren’t looking for anecdotal instances but using the survey to assess if people believe this happening and to what degree.