Why is China protecting terrorists ?

Sprint ZeroHero
Mar 14 28 Comments

For the 4th time China has used veto power in UNSC to stop designating Masood Azhar ( a dreaded terrorist from Pakistan ) a global threat and a terrorist. Question is why are they backing terrorist ? Is it because India supports Dalai Lama?

comments

Want to comment? LOG IN or SIGN UP
TOP 28 Comments
  • New vst
    No point cribbing about it. They are just using Pakistan as a leverage with India, 1/5th of the size and influence, all India can do at the moment is to remember, focus on the economy and hit them when the time is right. Nothing gives more power than a good economy and the foreign/defense policy that you could play by throwing cash( ask the Saudi's)
    Mar 141
  • Zillow Group SnDe72
    TC?
    Mar 140
  • Microsoft x0x0x0x0x0
    One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. Look at Al Qaeda and its history.
    Mar 142
    • Sprint ZeroHero
      OP
      So you are saying, the person who killed hundreds of innocent Indians over the years , is a freedom fighter ? So is Al Qaeda to you an organization that cares about human freedom ?? Lol .. wtf bro !?
      Mar 14
    • Microsoft x0x0x0x0x0
      I would cut heads of all terrorists. It's just some countries that support terrorists if those are harassing their adversaries.

      "Al Qaeda is on our side in Syria" - Hillary Clinton in Wikileaks emails.
      Mar 14
  • Comcast tlXA65
    Let’s not bring world politics to employment/career chat.
    There must be plenty of arguments from other side as well but that’s should not be a focus of this forum...
    Mar 141
    • The Home Depot joppkopit
      Are you suggesting Blind should drop the politics tag? There are plenty of posts under that tag, but mostly they are about American politics and I don't see any such complaints on those posts.
      China has officially stated their side after vetoing against this terrorist group saying they need more time to evaluate. They have been blocking this resolution for 10 years now, unilaterally. If they have "plenty of arguments", they should care to share some.
      Mar 14
  • Microsoft weirvhtd
    China is cheap and does not value human lives.. Terrorism will bite them back
    Mar 143
    • LinkedIn fL2W&ZhPR
      us support isis
      Mar 14
    • Microsoft weirvhtd
      What do you mean by that? Usa does it so that is correct?
      Mar 14
    • Microsoft weirvhtd
      And I doubt usa does that, but that is entirely another matter
      Mar 14
  • Humana goldN
    Money talks and bullshit walks. India doesn’t have as deep pockets as China so India can’t do anything now. Plan for growing ur pockets with better economy , plan for future and then u can dictate terms.
    Mar 140
  • Apple KGHP41
    Why do we care? They should just assassinate him if he’s so problematic. Don’t go crying to UNSC.
    Mar 144
    • Humana goldN
      Lol. For that u need precision guided munitions and a platform to carry them across ground-based aerial defenses and radars along with ability to track and monitor with powerful satellites. Also if a leader is deliberately being held in a hospital u can’t take him out due to massive collateral damage.
      None of this India posses so it’s a nothing but a pipe dream right now.
      Mar 14
    • Apple KGHP41
      I said assassinate. People were perfectly able to assassinate before all that technology. Get your head out of your ass.
      Mar 14
    • Humana goldN
      Not possible when the said person is a. guarded by their military b. In a military hospital or c. Housed in a military base or installation. U can’t walk up to him and do what u are asking. Only aerial routes are available which are way beyond India’s capability. And even if they are available u risk massive collateral damage or full blown war for going after military hospitals and bases
      Mar 15
    • Apple KGHP41
      You’re assuming 1) India cannot pay off people 2) India cannot infiltrate Pakistan military basis
      Mar 16
  • Intel / EngDonaldDD's
    Of course India directly protecting the head of a Chinese enemy state is going to work out badly for India.

    Politics is about quibbling and revenge. India is protecting Tibet. India will suffer endlessly whenever China has an opportunity to get India
    Mar 143
    • Microsoft weirvhtd
      Well of not for tibet, China is going to claim ownership of entire north east India!
      China does a bunch of evil stuff and the buck stops here
      Mar 14
    • Rubrik harvest25
      And Daila Lama is a terrorist now? China will support terrorists of every country it has problems with? Does China as a country has no morals?
      How about you?
      Mar 15
    • Intel / EngDonaldDD's
      Are you really mad? Do you actually consider the truth? Do you think understanding the truth means I have no morals?

      It's a fact, China is pissed at India about the Dalai Lama. China knows that the biggest risk is when its citizens smarten up and realize their life and government has been a lie. The Dalai Lama represents that movement and possibility. If he is free to practice, people will eventually reject the Chinese government.

      /s /s Yes, I am the one urging China to support Pakistan 🇵🇰. I wrote to Mao and now we're pen pals. Best buds. We go waaaayyyy back. They gave me the top social credit score /s /s
      Mar 15
  • Infosys ncsB30
    One mountain cannot contain two tigers
    Mar 150
  • Deutsche Bank xwqw03
    What has China to do with Azhar? Feels like Fake Story.
    Mar 143
    • Google ovBk62
      They vetoed some UNSC vote
      Mar 14
    • Sprint ZeroHero
      OP
      Why don’t you check it out before calling it fake story !.
      Mar 14
    • Deutsche Bank xwqw03
      Ok just saw news. Well it's kind of political I guess.
      Mar 14
  • Quora mDXn01
    Because india is weak, that is it. Only stronger deserves respect and has right to define what is terrorism. Weakers words are nothing.
    Apr 70

Join verified employees in our anonymous social network!Download the app!

close