PoliticsJun 27, 2019
OathAtinlay2
Add a comment
Amazon aRzf75 Jun 27, 2019

@ "How refusing to assist in providing basic needs to people in the detention centers is helping them is anybody’s guess" The idea is they shouldn't be detained

Google trumpelosi Jun 27, 2019

And refusing to provide these services is somehow going to force the government to stop detaining them? After it's been made abundantly clear that the government isn't super concerned about meeting these basic needs, is stonewalling court decisions for extended periods of time, and has a majority on the supreme court? Oh and not to mention that we're in a market economy and if company A won't provide a basic service, company B will. Seems like counterproductive virtue signaling to me.

Amazon aRzf75 Jun 27, 2019

Maybe felony charges of child abuse bought against the agents and administration officials who kept kids in squalor will help get the message across.

Google s8G1mY Jun 27, 2019

lmao this can cut both ways, this WILL cut both ways. One day BoA is going to refuse service to something liberals agree with and suddenly banks having discretion over who they serve will be an outage.

New
LtAldoRain Jun 27, 2019

Won’t end well? Oh really? How is that?