Is the bar easier/harder at any of the subsidiaries?
Have a recruiter screen at Chronicle and a phone screen at Verily.
Want to see the real deal?
More inside scoop? View in App
More inside scoop? View in App
blind
SUPPORT
FOLLOW US
DOWNLOAD THE APP:
FOLLOWING
Industries
Job Groups
- Software Engineering
- Product Management
- Information Technology
- Data Science & Analytics
- Management Consulting
- Hardware Engineering
- Design
- Sales
- Security
- Investment Banking & Sell Side
- Marketing
- Private Equity & Buy Side
- Corporate Finance
- Supply Chain
- Business Development
- Human Resources
- Operations
- Legal
- Admin
- Customer Service
- Communications
Return to Office
Work From Home
COVID-19
Layoffs
Investments & Money
Work Visa
Housing
Referrals
Job Openings
Startups
Office Life
Mental Health
HR Issues
Blockchain & Crypto
Fitness & Nutrition
Travel
Health Care & Insurance
Tax
Hobbies & Entertainment
Working Parents
Food & Dining
IPO
Side Jobs
Show more
SUPPORT
FOLLOW US
DOWNLOAD THE APP:
comments
A) Googlers interview to go over to other bets only after thorough examination of their perf reviews. If they didn’t exceed expectations they won’t be taken. So generally, the bar is higher and more selective but no process is perfect.
B) if you go to another bet and you want to go to Google you do interview but it’s generally a soft landing. To that end, the reason is Government, I mean Google is 85,000 people where as the bets are startups on different processes and compensation.
Chronicle is actually doing some incredible stuff and early early stage. Verily is a bit different and more mature.