I was scheduled for back to back technical interviews with two different interviewers. First one went fine. For the second one, I explained (but didn’t write code) a solution that would produce the correct results but would have a poor runtime for large datasets. We started working through the optimized solution. I got stuck a few times and had to debug; I never ended up producing the correct solution—although I was probably 90% there. I just needed to eliminate a few false positives that I think I would have been able to do in a few extra minutes. Am I doomed?
Maybe not if the first one went so well that the interviewer will strongly advocate for you. But you’d probably need an exceptional performance in the first one to overcome the second one.
Yes, they never got back to me. I did an extremely simple mistake in an otherwise complete program
so it didn't compile or print with the right answer?
India
13h
566
'Hindutva': The Radical Hindu Ideology That Seeks to 'Push Christianity Out of India’
Personal Finance
7h
849
Thank you AAPL and NVDA
AMA
Yesterday
1282
PM Manager, early 40s, married and ENM (Ethical Non Monogamous) AMA
World Conflicts
10h
412
Is "From the River to the Sea" So Wrong?
World Conflicts
12h
471
Israeli precision-guided munition likely killed group of children playing foosball in Gaza, weapons experts say
yes