This is a sobering take... these are the kinds of tactics your company may well use to do it: "Among ProPublica’s findings, IBM: Denied older workers information the law says they need in order to decide whether they’ve been victims of age bias, and required them to sign away the right to go to court or join with others to seek redress. Targeted people for layoffs and firings with techniques that tilted against older workers, even when the company rated them high performers. In some instances, the money saved from the departures went toward hiring young replacements. Converted job cuts into retirements and took steps to boost resignations and firings. The moves reduced the number of employees counted as layoffs, where high numbers can trigger public disclosure requirements. Encouraged employees targeted for layoff to apply for other IBM positions, while quietly advising managers not to hire them and requiring many of the workers to train their replacements. Told some older employees being laid off that their skills were out of date, but then brought them back as contract workers, often for the same work at lower pay and fewer benefits." https://features.propublica.org/ibm/ibm-age-discrimination-american-workers/
Most companies do this, maybe not at such a level, but they do. That said, IBM is amongst the shittiest companies I’ve ever worked for.
There is a lot of ageism in our industry. It's wise to be saving a lot now so you have "🦆 you" money when the time comes.
IBM lays off so many people without any clear goal in mind besides cutting costs for the next quarter. I’ve heard executives talk about how they try different things to deal with the layoffs (they are just getting told to do them), sometimes cutting low performers across their org, sometimes just cutting out entire teams regardless of performance. Personally, I think it has laid off a lot of old people because it has laid off a lot of people in general. If there were any adverse effects, I would attribute them more to general incompetence rather than malice toward older workers. Any way you cut it, it’s not a great story, though.
Honestly it's a damned if you do, damned if you don't kind of situation. That being said, layoffs in IBM are sometimes totally random. IBM doesn't pay well enough to treat engineers as a commodity that it can scale down or up at will. The few good people who agree to stay with the company need to be coveted.
India
Yesterday
1798
Slavery has REVERSED! the US is the slave!!! Check out this dude who pays a personal trainer in India
Tech Industry
Yesterday
890
Best LCOL or MCOL city?
Tech Industry
Yesterday
1174
Do you really think Amazon is that bad
Health & Wellness
6h
700
How can I find success dating in NYC
Tech Industry
Yesterday
2255
I paid 250 for a Google Referral and got Scammed
Ehh I’m too young for this to matter.
But this isn't really about age, is it? It's about people targeted for termination. Read from others experiences. See the tactics, and understand how companies operate. And you'll know how to read the signs, and strategize how to prepare when it's you that's among the targeted.
Pretty sure this was age related.