Recently I had my interview at Atlassian Sydney. I had 2 rounds and I am confused whether I did well or not. In every round, the interviewer started with a simple question and made it complex in every iteration. I was able to explain the approach, code the solution and run it for custom inputs. The code ran perfectly fine. But for 4th iteration of the question, I wasn't able to complete the code because of time crunch. But I explained the approach. This happened in both the rounds. And now I am skeptical if this will be considered something negative or not. Can someone please give their inputs?
Please ask them to improve confluence and JIRA while you are at it
That's typical of our official interview strategy (MTV is much less consistent about it than Sydney) Without knowing the team involved or the questions, I can't say for sure, but I'd expect that making it to a 4th part (3rd level of increased complexity) is usually a good sign.
Health & Wellness
6h
717
How can I find success dating in NYC
Tech Industry
Yesterday
1186
Do you really think Amazon is that bad
Tech Industry
Yesterday
902
Best LCOL or MCOL city?
India
Yesterday
1811
Slavery has REVERSED! the US is the slave!!! Check out this dude who pays a personal trainer in India
Tech Industry
Yesterday
2279
I paid 250 for a Google Referral and got Scammed
If you did a good job explaining the approach for the last one, sounds like it went well to me.