Ladies and gentlemen - here is a fine example of double standards. Ask for a white owned bank and you'll get rightly crucified and here comes this bold racist and people are actually engaging in a conversation instead of screaming for a crucifixion.
@snapchat - being color blind is the only way forward. If you want to support some race because of whatever inequalities you feel they suffer, then it should be fair when others decide to support other races for whatever inequalities they feel they suffer. Everyone can find data points to support their views. Either you're color blind or you're not.
The difference between a peaceful protestor and a mostly peaceful protestor is huge. Just like color Blind and mostly color blind.
If anyone feels that is unfair, they are just going to have to tank it. It's the way Indians and Asians are taught to deal with discrimination and it's honestly the most effective. Making your own seat at the table is far different from being given a seat at the table out of pity. I've come across many people who've openly accepted that they are often more strict with certain minority candidates during interviews because you simply dont know if the company is trying to pull some virtue signaling bullshit. That's the cost of not being race blind.
As I said, we need a better way of talking about it. We can talk about the abused and the abusers instead of membership on a group of same color/sex/whatever.
Too many people try to argue that abused and abusers are the same thing because the color of their skin, by itself, does not imply the abuse relationship.
This way we’d go back in time, more racial division is only helpful for politicians. Think about it white owned banks, black owned banks, brown owned banks, every other color ..There is no end to racial divide If we think this way.
comments
The difference between a peaceful protestor and a mostly peaceful protestor is huge. Just like color Blind and mostly color blind.
If anyone feels that is unfair, they are just going to have to tank it. It's the way Indians and Asians are taught to deal with discrimination and it's honestly the most effective. Making your own seat at the table is far different from being given a seat at the table out of pity. I've come across many people who've openly accepted that they are often more strict with certain minority candidates during interviews because you simply dont know if the company is trying to pull some virtue signaling bullshit. That's the cost of not being race blind.
Too many people try to argue that abused and abusers are the same thing because the color of their skin, by itself, does not imply the abuse relationship.