There are accounts of FB rejecting candidates for even venturing into non-optimal solutions regardless of whether if they turn it around.
Is this a common thing for rest of FAANG? How are the attitudes for getting every step right out of rote and in order with textbook thought process explanations vs changing the approach as you write the code, deciding on a different data structure midway through, erasing and rewriting the logic after seeing a more optimal solution etc.
Let's assume in both cases candidates are communicating well enough
Want to see the real deal?
More inside scoop? View in App
More inside scoop? View in App
blind
SUPPORT
FOLLOW US
DOWNLOAD THE APP:
FOLLOWING
Industries
Job Groups
- Software Engineering
- Product Management
- Information Technology
- Data Science & Analytics
- Management Consulting
- Hardware Engineering
- Design
- Sales
- Security
- Investment Banking & Sell Side
- Marketing
- Private Equity & Buy Side
- Corporate Finance
- Supply Chain
- Business Development
- Human Resources
- Operations
- Legal
- Admin
- Customer Service
- Communications
Return to Office
Work From Home
COVID-19
Layoffs
Investments & Money
Work Visa
Housing
Referrals
Job Openings
Startups
Office Life
Mental Health
HR Issues
Blockchain & Crypto
Fitness & Nutrition
Travel
Health Care & Insurance
Tax
Hobbies & Entertainment
Working Parents
Food & Dining
IPO
Side Jobs
Show more
SUPPORT
FOLLOW US
DOWNLOAD THE APP:
comments
But if you were say just started coding brute Force and the end just made corrections or hand waved it. maybe not