Is it right to pay top execs 1M each while declining to boost worker pay?
#google #amazon #meta #tech
https://www.theverge.com/2022/1/4/22867419/google-execs-million-salaries-raise-sec
Want to see the real deal?
More inside scoop? View in App
More inside scoop? View in App
blind
SUPPORT
FOLLOW US
DOWNLOAD THE APP:
FOLLOWING
Industries
Job Groups
- Software Engineering
- Product Management
- Information Technology
- Data Science & Analytics
- Management Consulting
- Hardware Engineering
- Design
- Sales
- Security
- Investment Banking & Sell Side
- Marketing
- Private Equity & Buy Side
- Corporate Finance
- Supply Chain
- Business Development
- Human Resources
- Operations
- Legal
- Admin
- Customer Service
- Communications
Return to Office
Work From Home
COVID-19
Layoffs
Investments & Money
Work Visa
Housing
Referrals
Job Openings
Startups
Office Life
Mental Health
HR Issues
Blockchain & Crypto
Fitness & Nutrition
Travel
Health Care & Insurance
Tax
Hobbies & Entertainment
Working Parents
Food & Dining
IPO
Side Jobs
Show more
SUPPORT
FOLLOW US
DOWNLOAD THE APP:
The Verge
comments
Leadership definition is making others work more for less pay. Example:
1) Breaking the union reward$ executive.
2) Declining to negotiate strike reward$ executive.
3) Hiring labor for low pay, making them work like machine reward$ executive. This labor also includes corporate employees.
4) Chaos is a ladder to climb up the top 1%. Chaos like virus outbreak, war, supply chain issues, oil spill accident, civil unrest, loan defaults, and bankruptcy. Chaos and leverage are a well taught subject in executive MBA. Creating chaos reward$ executive.
5) The top richest people are those who inherited the wealth. Starting from zero net worth won't get you to 99th percentile. It's a hunger game where no one wins. Only the inheritance of wealth wins the quality of life.
I think you're paid well and don't want others to get paid well?