Which company has the fairest performance management system?

Aug 23, 2019 25 Comments

Some companies pay more (or less) than others
Some companies demand a higher (or lower) bar
Some companies have a better (or worse) wlb

BUT

which company will treat you the fairest in performance reviews?

(E.g. least politics, most systematic, best compensation for big achievements, etc)

Please comment with why you think the system works the best

@Facebook @Google @Microsoft @Oracle @uber @Airbnb

153 PARTICIPANTS SELECT ONLY ONE ANSWER
VOTE VIEW RESULT

comments

Want to comment? LOG IN or SIGN UP
TOP 25 Comments
  • This comment was deleted by original commenter.

  • Amazon
    πŸ¦„πŸ¦„πŸ¦„πŸ¦„πŸ¦„πŸ¦„πŸ¦„x10

    Go to company page Amazon

    πŸ¦„πŸ¦„πŸ¦„πŸ¦„πŸ¦„πŸ¦„πŸ¦„x10
    I’ve heard a lot of googlers complain about the promo process, is it actually good?
    Aug 23, 2019 8
  • Google
    1049xnr8sl

    Go to company page Google

    1049xnr8sl
    I wish this poll would discard Google votes from people who don't work here. Our system is just as flawed as any other.

    In fact, recent changes have it trending towards the average. L5 and under and it's up to your local stack rank.
    Aug 25, 2019 6
  • Google
    G minority

    Go to company page Google

    G minority
    Apple?
    Aug 23, 2019 0
  • Facebook / Eng
    Zuckurberg

    Go to company page Facebook Eng

    Zuckurberg
    If a company is successful, it means their promo process was mostly fair. Without a fair promo process, you could not achieve success. By that logic, I say that Google's was good until recently (their CEO promotion was not fair, IMHO).

    FB has been successful so far, but I could see Facebook may have some stumble blocks to overcome in long term. IMO, FB has so many people at higher levels who are not that good, they are there because of lot of hard work sacrificing WLB but in reality they don't have skills needed for that role. Most of them would fail an interview at the same level at Google. We will know in long term how is that going to affect the company as a whole.

    Microsoft is the company of politics. Their success in the past 20 years were held of because of that. I believe it has changed recently after their new CEO. But not sure.

    At Amazon promotion is purely at manager discretion. However a manager has to show success of his or her team to the top management. As long as they can show success, they can promote whomsoever they want. It is more of a capitalist mechanism at play in Amazon. So a manager has to reward their team who are bringing them success. There is room for politics but it would eventually balance out.

    Netflix has a very opaque process. No title change. No promotion. All we have is single title. So no one know what is going under the hood. IMO, this is not good as engineers have no way to compare themselves against to see at what level they are operating at. Hence room for lot more politics.
    Aug 25, 2019 1