I was told that if you like pristine code, G is better than FB, but FB infra did care more about long term than the rest of the company and tend to have less hacks. How is it? Do you feel proud of your codebase?
I was at Azure and now at GCP. Azure: - Good code quality & architecture - decent Tools - Fast moving - lots of autonomy to engineers Google: - Better code, tools. - Far superior architecture (over engineered) - Slow moving (surprise!!) - less autonomy compared to Azure. - more $$$ No knowledge of FB, except FB pays more than G
Pretty sure G pays more
FB infra is probably less hacky than the rest of the company, but it's still hacktastic. Trying to turn it around, but sometimes it's like... 😐
Worked on FB infra for 2 years. It’s so, so ridiculously terrible it’s just 😂. Google was way better, totally different level. Can’t speak for Azure.
Health & Wellness
4h
523
How can I find success dating in NYC
Tech Industry
Yesterday
787
Best LCOL or MCOL city?
Tech Industry
Yesterday
1007
Do you really think Amazon is that bad
India
Yesterday
1607
Slavery has REVERSED! the US is the slave!!! Check out this dude who pays a personal trainer in India
Tech Industry
3h
313
Should I reveal that I joined a company 1 week ago to recruiters
What is the infra code quality for Azure?
Azure is decent. Google is better. Have no inside knowledge of FB. Ex-MSFT at GOOG now.
Hi, your question does no imply a comparison. I want feedback from engineers that had seen the two or the three code bases. I defently want a better codebase if that is what you want to hear. Thanks.