If you are an interview candidate, then do not let companies play you like this
I just got rejected after a video call with a VP at C3.ai. It's kinda unprofessional to let your hopes up as they said I did well for the onsite and destroyed me after a casual conversation with the VP. There were some hiccups during the interview call as me being held up and arriving a bit late. After 3 postponements from them, I feel like I earned some leeway on my busy schedule.
I feel like he didn't spend any time querying my technical prowess, and yet decided that I wasn't technically strong enough.
The entire process from phone interview to the final VP call took about a span of almost 1 and half-month. Just from the onsite to the hiring calls it took 3-4 weeks. I personally feel like, you cannot let a candidate that did well on onsite spend 3-4 weeks for additional "behavioral" interviews.
I am just glad I had other offers to decide and move on, but I wanted to let you guys know about the process churn by them and cannot let companies play you like that.
AI & IoT Software Platform for Digital Transformation | C3
comments
Shouldn't you be more prepared when you meet a VP? And you are just complaining the VP hasn't done the homework before meeting you. Are you applying for the CEO?
Flagged by the community.