I had a super underwhelming interviewing experience with Netflix. Here are a few things I did not expect at all. The good: 1. Feedback after onsite, not just a yes or no. 2. The hiring manager was great with making sure I understood the requirements of the role.Ā 3. The onsite wasn't a day long process. 4. Submitting expenses was a breeze. The bad: 1. The phone interviews and onsite took over two months to schedule. Very poor communication from the recruiting team.Ā 2. They didn't tell me that my onsite was scheduled!!! I found out because the hiring manager sent me an email to talk about what to expect at the onsite. 3. The interviewers didn't even introduce themselves beyond providing a name. This was the case with two interview sessions during onsite. This is just not professional! 4. The problems were too open-ended, coupled with bad time management, the sessions felt rushed and didn't allow any time to think. 5. So much SQL! I bombed this part. Lack of prep was my own fault. 6. Too many domain specific questions when domain knowledge wasn't required for the role beyond basics. I am not sure what they were trying to test with a lot of these questions. 7. Whiteboard coding with 7mins left, leaving 6mins for me to write code. I'm a manager, I don't code everyday. I didn't leetcode before the interview, my bad. It was just very poor candidate experience. This made me appreciate the insistence on a very high bar for candidate experience at Amazon. Yes, there are a lot of things not right about Amazon, but prioritizing experience, whether its a customer or candidate, is definitely something I'll try to carry forward. This is not an attempt to justify my bad performance during the interview, just sharing my subpar experience with a sought after firm. TC 310k
I interviewed there many years ago but also had a really strange experience. Basically no feedback during the interview (ie no follow up q's) very vague questions, this was with a vp and director. No coding. No real follow up afterwards either. I didn't care because I took an offer elsewhere weeks later. <6 months later they were emailing me about roles again? It really turned me off, and I'm sure I made the right decision not joining. Love their product but they didn't have their interviewing together.
G Couldn't agree more
āThis made me appreciate the insistence on a very high bar for candidate experience at Amazon.ā This was not my experience when I interviewed at the Amazon HC. For example, one manager started my interview by bad mouthing quite badly the previous candidate. I assume mileage may vary.
Among all the companies I've interviewed till now, Amazon was absolutely the worst. MS was the most pleasant interview I've had
How so
Netflix once asked me, āDo you know JavaScript?ā When itās literally all over my resume and portfolio. Had a great experience at Amazon interview btw.
If you really appreciate feedback after on-site Iām sure your hiring manager and recruiter will appreciate this feedback. Itās constructive, so just email them the same text!
I did provide some verbal feedback to the HM, just don't want to burn bridges if it is not received with the same spirit.
Itās in Netflix culture to provide feedback, so it should be even more positively received than no feedback. But if you provided verbally - itās good!
Wow, that's quite a few big misses by Nflx. Thanks for providing the feedback.
@ball how long of wait between on-site and decision?
It really varies by team, what candidates are in pipeline, if the candidate ends up a good culture fit and maybe a bette technical fit for another team.
What position? Team?
I was looking at a Sr DS position with one of their Analytics teams