title
Want to see the real deal?
More inside scoop? View in App
More inside scoop? View in App
blind
SUPPORT
FOLLOW US
DOWNLOAD THE APP:
FOLLOWING
Industries
Job Groups
- Software Engineering
- Product Management
- Information Technology
- Data Science & Analytics
- Management Consulting
- Hardware Engineering
- Design
- Sales
- Security
- Investment Banking & Sell Side
- Marketing
- Private Equity & Buy Side
- Corporate Finance
- Supply Chain
- Business Development
- Human Resources
- Operations
- Legal
- Admin
- Customer Service
- Communications
Return to Office
Work From Home
COVID-19
Layoffs
Investments & Money
Work Visa
Housing
Referrals
Job Openings
Startups
Office Life
Mental Health
HR Issues
Blockchain & Crypto
Fitness & Nutrition
Travel
Health Care & Insurance
Tax
Hobbies & Entertainment
Working Parents
Food & Dining
IPO
Side Jobs
Show more
SUPPORT
FOLLOW US
DOWNLOAD THE APP:
comments
Over time it seems that the costs of running a quant shop have increased relative to the "easily available" alpha sources. This means that larger players can compete very well, but new players need to establish themselves at a certain size to be viable (~$1bn), whereas in the past (2000s) people were launching with much smaller vehicles.
In the higher frequency space, we've seen a large number of players consolidate too, but there the amount of capital needed is lower. Conversely the tech requirements are far higher.
The end effect of this is that quant finance is likely to be dominated by a few large funds, moreso perhaps than it is now. Firms like AQR manage a lot of capital yes, but their strategies look increasingly similar (from a marketing standpoint) to ETFs. Similarly trend followers have underperformed expectations for quite some time.