Everyone keeps repeating how disengagement stats don't matter and how Cruise has a crappy tech stack, but if so, how come they manage to have a comparable number of miles per disengagement in SF as Waymo does in the suburbs, per CA 2020 report?
Are they driving the same route all the time? Underreporting disengagements? Training their safety drivers to take more risk?
Asking genuinely, why does the industry seem to disbelieve what looks like Cruise's lead?
Want to see the real deal?
More inside scoop? View in App
More inside scoop? View in App
blind
SUPPORT
FOLLOW US
DOWNLOAD THE APP:
FOLLOWING
Industries
Job Groups
- Software Engineering
- Product Management
- Information Technology
- Data Science & Analytics
- Management Consulting
- Hardware Engineering
- Design
- Sales
- Security
- Investment Banking & Sell Side
- Marketing
- Private Equity & Buy Side
- Corporate Finance
- Supply Chain
- Business Development
- Human Resources
- Operations
- Legal
- Admin
- Customer Service
- Communications
Return to Office
Work From Home
COVID-19
Layoffs
Investments & Money
Work Visa
Housing
Referrals
Job Openings
Startups
Office Life
Mental Health
HR Issues
Blockchain & Crypto
Fitness & Nutrition
Travel
Health Care & Insurance
Tax
Hobbies & Entertainment
Working Parents
Food & Dining
IPO
Side Jobs
Show more
SUPPORT
FOLLOW US
DOWNLOAD THE APP:
comments
There's probably no way to know for sure who is in the "lead," or whether that's even a meaningful question, but in fairness we have hit a fair number of milestones already that haven't been duplicated yet.
Actual disengagement rates for nearly all companies in SF is more like every few miles.