To which party? If it does have an effect, and if the intent is to protect the interest of the American worker, it sounds like it has an overall benefit for the party it's intended for.
You could argue on the total global economy it has a net-zero effect, but American government efforts aren't made for the benefit of the global economy.
For the American economy as well - when jobs are shipped out, the economy loses money and the government loses tax revenue. And the jobs that were meant to be protected aren't protected anyway.
E. G. Look at what happened with the Carrier plant Indianapolis that Trump "saved"
Really. All it does is asking federally owned entities to not hire H1B. And donβt outsource to other countries.
The problem is that it comes with nothing more. Why are foreigners more qualified than US citizens ? They could afford a better education. Why are agencies are forced to outsource ? Budget constraints. They canβt afford US citizens.
Of these two problems, how many does this EO solves? None.
You are the guy who calls everyone racist for not supporting S386. Anddddd you think American gov creating policies to protect domestic tech workers has something to do with WTO ????
comments
You could argue on the total global economy it has a net-zero effect, but American government efforts aren't made for the benefit of the global economy.
E. G. Look at what happened with the Carrier plant Indianapolis that Trump "saved"
The problem is that it comes with nothing more. Why are foreigners more qualified than US citizens ? They could afford a better education. Why are agencies are forced to outsource ? Budget constraints. They canβt afford US citizens.
Of these two problems, how many does this EO solves? None.
Also never called anyone racist for s386. You have mistaken with someone else.