WFH is the only correct ecological choice
Jun 7, 2021
17 Comments
There's a WFH vs WFW debate (usually 75% vs 25% according to every blind poll).
Why is it a debate? We have an opportunity to change nothing (continue WFH) and help stop this insane consumption of fuel killing ourselves and our planet.
The discussion should end right there.
Hey big bosses -- now's your chance
comments
I am required to be physically on-site. It is part of my job and the duties I have accepted in my SDE role.
No worries about fuel consumption.
Reducing power consumption is the only good option we should be aiming for
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11116-017-9846-3
Surely you'll change your mind and advocate for returning to office now, right? Or were you grasping at misguided environmental claims to support your personal preference?
But that's just me