What’s better for resume? Fox: direct hire OR The North Face: contract?
Jan 14
7 Comments
Self taught, broke into software industry by selling the shit out of myself.
I care a lot about the first impression of my resume for recruiters/hiring managers/interviewers so I can get as many opportunities as possible in the future.
I have these two offers as of right now.
Fox: Direct Hire
TC: 120k
Project is less fun
The North Face : Contract-to-hire
TC: 120k
Project is more fun
I think Fox is a more recognizable name, but I just realized it’s also a really controversial company because of how much people care about politics. Especially with how liberal tech is. I don’t care at all about politics. But I’m trying to craft a resume that passes filters, and even though The North Face isn’t as recognizable, it may be better. Thoughts?
comments
North Face is harmless.
I voted that you work on the most fun project - you'll be more engaged and thus learn better.
Like when I mention I worked for Disney I always feel there is an asterisk next to it cuz it was contract. And I’m paranoid people lower the significance of my experience at Disney when I mention it in interviews.
But hearing someone from Lyft say that it can work in my advantage later in my career makes me feel amazing. It’s a real tool I can use to re-frame my bullshit insecurities. I’ll get direct hire at big tech one day, and all this jumping around could prove to be an advantage.
Thanks!!!