- what % of employees are internally promoted to managers compared to hired from outside managers - what % of employees were hired as outside managers while their previous job title was not manager. - what % of employees quit before 1 yr completion of job and from which teams - what % of employees are core computer science and electronic hw engineers compared to other fields of engineering - what % of employees are contributing to code compared to non coding employees ( management and product managers) - what % of employees were allowed to move between different groups without burning bridges with each other teams. - what % of employees are happy with the salary and perks. - what % of employees think that the interviewing process was unnecessarily completed to the day to day work they are doing - many more such data. Most of these companies are good at getting such data and by making this data public , candidates can Walt judge the company and not go in the promises of HR and hiring managers . Of course they can always fake this data, but would be a good starting point for any data based arguments in the future if hired within these companies.
Because employers and recruiters are not interested in competing with each other or providing you with a good candidate experience. They want fodder for the meat grinder. Eventually some employees build a network and move jobs based on personal recommendations, not public info.
I have heard from many recruiters making comments that “oh we don’t hire managers from outside , we promote internally” but I can clearly see many managers job posting from that companies , looks like each recruiter have their own agenda and don’t care about the candidates career interests
That would trigger chaos in terms of employee retention as external hires always gets more benefit than the promoted once. Wish it was other way around
Why would they? Weighting the pros and cons, do you think it's beneficial to companies? All companies have most of those answers , but they keep it private, and try to improve the number to the companies benefit. Not to be shared publicly
To spend time and effort for google interview process , we need to know this info
Because there are no pros and all cons?
AFAIK question 2, what % of employees are hired as managers that weren't previously managers -- I'm pretty sure at FAANG that number is VERY close to 0. I've been a manager for 3 years and have two management offers from decent (but not FAANG level) big public tech companies. Google is willing to pay A LOT more than them (they're the highest offer). But they will not even LET me interview for M1.
At Amazon many of these “satisfaction” stats are indeed published internationally as part of the yearly tech survey
That’s really good to know , is this data published on open internet ? If yes links ?
The catch is that HR team is managing these surveys and so they could publish whatever they want to