I believe bitcoin supporters only do that because they see it as a way to make money fast. Nobody holds it because they believe it is an "awesome technology". Given the amount of energy spent to mine it, the technology kind of sucks.
If at least bitcoin were used for something barely useful like calculate digits of Pi, find life in outer space(like SETI project), whatever. Bitcoin proof of work is the most stupid thing invented.
Is there anything better that I should own? I've never bought a bitcoin for the reasons described above. I occasionally bought some ethereum and stellar (less than 10k), but not super convinced either.
Want to see the real deal?
More inside scoop? View in App
More inside scoop? View in App
blind
SUPPORT
FOLLOW US
DOWNLOAD THE APP:
FOLLOWING
Industries
Job Groups
- Software Engineering
- Product Management
- Information Technology
- Data Science & Analytics
- Management Consulting
- Hardware Engineering
- Design
- Sales
- Security
- Investment Banking & Sell Side
- Marketing
- Private Equity & Buy Side
- Corporate Finance
- Supply Chain
- Business Development
- Human Resources
- Operations
- Legal
- Admin
- Customer Service
- Communications
Return to Office
Work From Home
COVID-19
Layoffs
Investments & Money
Work Visa
Housing
Referrals
Job Openings
Startups
Office Life
Mental Health
HR Issues
Blockchain & Crypto
Fitness & Nutrition
Travel
Health Care & Insurance
Tax
Hobbies & Entertainment
Working Parents
Food & Dining
IPO
Side Jobs
Show more
SUPPORT
FOLLOW US
DOWNLOAD THE APP:
comments
I’m genuinely excited about ethereum or whatever generic blockchain ends up winning - eth is king for now
In proof of stake (ETH 2), the blockchain secures itself. If you ever have a supermajority of bad validators, the chain is lost -- validators would have total power over which transactions are included in the chain, for as long as they want.
Even if there were a 51% attack of BTC, more GPU power could come online to support the correct chain. Deep chain reorgs are very short-lived (and have never happened on BTC). Even Dogecoin has not been successfully 51% attacked since it's surge. It's very difficult to attack a POW blockchain.
I encourage you to think a bit harder about consensus mechanisms before dismissing BTC technology because of FUD you heard on the media. Most people with 'opinions' have very shallow understanding of consensus mechanisms.
Also supply and demand of electricity makes it so that the percentage of energy allocated to BTC will stay within reasonable bounds.
That said, ETH 2 will *probably* work because $14B are staked and it's unlikely that there will be a supermajority of bad validators. Moreover, people will keep a record of socially accepted block headers and their first-seen timestamps. I would stay away from Stellar, Cardano, Polkadot and other shitcoins.