Fox news absurd arguments against gun control

Oct 3, 2017 35 Comments

I saw fox news beat up democratic senator calling for gun control. There is good arguments on both sides. Guns can kill, so can knifes and trucks. But automatic weapons makes it easy. Case in point Sandy Hook. Could the murderer drive a truck into classroom? Las Vegas, could the murderer used a knife to cause mass casualty. Its harder to achieve thought less mass killings without guns. This is common sense. But not at fox news. They want silencer and more powerful weapons in the hands of citizen. In lot of ways, I see gun control is a last fighting ground for the trump base. I maybe wrong here but share my empathy for citizens who feel giving up their freedom and liberty because of a lunatic is not fair. Thoughts?

comments

Want to comment? LOG IN or SIGN UP
TOP 35 Comments
  • Oracle
    AnnoDomini

    Go to company page Oracle

    AnnoDomini
    There are already thousands of federal gun laws, and hundreds of additional state laws concerning restrictions. Next step is to ban all guns. Is this what you want? Remember, mass murderers of the past (Stalin, Hitler, Mao, etc.) agreed that gun bans work.
    Oct 3, 2017 6
    • Are you seriously telling me that in case of a rogue government, citizens armed with semi-automatic weapons can defeat an army with tanks and missiles ? You guys are seriously delusional.
      Oct 3, 2017
    • Microsoft / Eng
      deadpan

      Go to company page Microsoft Eng

      deadpan
      That approach seems to be working for rebels in Waziristan, Afghanistan, Iraq. It was working in Syria until Russia decided that civilian casualties didn't matter.

      Also, don't assume that the armed forces will fully support the government after a tyrannical shift. Half of them would probably be on the side of the resistance, or at least unwilling to shoot at their fellow Americans.

      It's a horrifying scenario.
      Oct 4, 2017
  • The discussion of automatic weapons comes from people who either don't know what they're talking about or want to obscure the facts to push more gun control.

    Automatic weapons were not used in the Vegas shooting or Sandy Hook. In fact they have only been used in 3 shootings since the 1930s. The Vegas shooter used a bump stock which simulates auto shooting. If you want to talk about banning bump stocks then go ahead.

    However the fact is that automatic weapons are already highly illegal and difficult to get. Also there is no push by the NRA to make silencers legal. That was just Hillary off her meds again.
    Oct 3, 2017 13
    • VMware
      trollbully

      Go to company page VMware

      trollbully
      I'm not going to invest several thousand dollars in weapons and ammo to prove a point to you. If you'd bothered to watch a video on bump fire stocks you'd under stand the principle.

      Read the wiki article on bump_fire and educate your self. Bump firing can be done with zero additional apparatus. Therefore adding apparatus like a cushion makes it easier.

      The article also says a rubber band can be used to make a bump stock. It also yes that batf banned a bump stock after a spring was added then re approved it after the spring was removed. You can buy springs at the hardware store. Gonna ban springs ?

      Then google for the video "bumpfire ar15 without bumpfire stock".

      Gonna ban YouTube now ?

      Seriously. Get a clue.
      Oct 3, 2017
    • I don’t know if you watched the videos, but that dude emptied two magazines into the crowd before they realized what was going on and reacted. So tell me that a silencer would have changed that how?
      Oct 3, 2017
  • Microsoft / Eng
    kdr

    Go to company page Microsoft Eng

    kdr
    If you ban guns, all you do is punish law abiding citizens. The criminals and murderers will just buy off the black market. Same thing as drug prohibition has done.
    Oct 3, 2017 0
  • Expedia
    Xsd29081

    Go to company page Expedia

    Xsd29081
    First off, suppressors are legal now. They are just exceedingly difficult to get legally. More difficult than getting even a pistol.

    Regarding mass killings, does anyone remember Timothy McVeigh? Guns have supplanted explosives as the psychopaths tool of choice lately. However explosives are still far more effective, and would have been in the case of Las Vegas. If someone could wave a magic wand and eradicate the world of all firearms, it doesn't solve the root of the issue that psychopaths exist, and are hell bent on wreaking havoc. They will just turn to a different tool.

    Lastly, it's important to point out that US violent crime, murder, and firearms crime rates are all dropping. That is despite the repeal of the 1994 assault weapons ban, despite the fact that firearm sales are at an all-time high, despite the fact that suppressor sales are at an all-time high. Now, I don't believe this is causal, however but the correlation is interesting, and absolutely does not support more gun control equals less crime.
    Oct 3, 2017 0
  • Juniper
    jpaero

    Go to company page Juniper

    jpaero
    once you give toys to kids, they're gonna bitch and moan when you take them away from them. you should've been more careful while giving them those toys in the first place because unlike kids, gun owners can vote.
    Oct 3, 2017 2
    • Apple
      😀🔥👌🙏z

      Go to company page Apple

      😀🔥👌🙏z
      If there is a referendum for gun control or banning guns vast majority would support it.
      Oct 3, 2017
    • VMware
      trollbully

      Go to company page VMware

      trollbully
      Which is why the federal government has no provision for referendums. The us federation is not a democracy. I don't understand why people keep bringing up popular vote arguments for every fucking issue in this country. This is not a democracy. It was never meant to be a democracy. It never will be a democracy.

      FFS there should be a civics test before anyone is admitted into the USA or allowed to post to the internet.
      Oct 4, 2017