The title says it all.
I’ve been a senior level TPM at a few different places and while the things differ slightly, the role always seems to revolve around being a glorified admin, a pseudo scrum master, and some sort of a (weak) project manager.
I’m wondering how engineers view the TPM role, and if my experience is typical or outside of the norm.
Want to see the real deal?
More inside scoop? View in App
More inside scoop? View in App
blind
SUPPORT
FOLLOW US
DOWNLOAD THE APP:
FOLLOWING
Industries
Job Groups
- Software Engineering
- Product Management
- Information Technology
- Data Science & Analytics
- Management Consulting
- Hardware Engineering
- Design
- Sales
- Security
- Investment Banking & Sell Side
- Marketing
- Private Equity & Buy Side
- Corporate Finance
- Supply Chain
- Business Development
- Human Resources
- Operations
- Legal
- Admin
- Customer Service
- Communications
Return to Office
Work From Home
COVID-19
Layoffs
Investments & Money
Work Visa
Housing
Referrals
Job Openings
Startups
Office Life
Mental Health
HR Issues
Blockchain & Crypto
Fitness & Nutrition
Travel
Health Care & Insurance
Tax
Hobbies & Entertainment
Working Parents
Food & Dining
IPO
Side Jobs
Show more
SUPPORT
FOLLOW US
DOWNLOAD THE APP:
comments
Ownership really varies with teams and companies. Generally engineers think we are moderately worthless because of feedback like yours.
Where I am at Amazon, nothing large and complex will ship without a TPM because engineers and managers generally don't have the skills or will to manage large engineering programs spanning different teams and orgs. That comes with huge stress, huge visibility but also huge impact and recognition. Unfortunately not a huge TC.
So I personnaly do not care about the opinion of SDE2s because they clearly have very little visibility and understanding about how the whole sausage is made.