How is it different from a gold-backed currency? What are the benefits? Why is everyone rushing to it? Is it a fad?
Want to see the real deal?
More inside scoop? View in App
More inside scoop? View in App
blind
SUPPORT
FOLLOW US
DOWNLOAD THE APP:
FOLLOWING
Industries
Job Groups
- Software Engineering
- Product Management
- Information Technology
- Data Science & Analytics
- Management Consulting
- Hardware Engineering
- Design
- Sales
- Security
- Investment Banking & Sell Side
- Marketing
- Private Equity & Buy Side
- Corporate Finance
- Supply Chain
- Business Development
- Human Resources
- Operations
- Legal
- Admin
- Customer Service
- Communications
Return to Office
Work From Home
COVID-19
Layoffs
Investments & Money
Work Visa
Housing
Referrals
Job Openings
Startups
Office Life
Mental Health
HR Issues
Blockchain & Crypto
Fitness & Nutrition
Travel
Health Care & Insurance
Tax
Hobbies & Entertainment
Working Parents
Food & Dining
IPO
Side Jobs
Show more
SUPPORT
FOLLOW US
DOWNLOAD THE APP:
comments
I figured I'd hear and learn from people who have had some experience with cryptocurrency.
A traditional fiat currency is backed by the issuing government's ability to levy and collect taxes in that currency. So, indirectly, on the strength and stability of the country's government and economy. For example, there will be demand on US$ as long as people are forced to pay taxes in US$. Obviously a crypto currency doesn't obtain any value from government backing.
It's not similar to a commodity either. Commodity usually have mostly intrinsic value, with the exception of precious metals, which obtain some value from artificial demand (for example, gold is usually much more expensive than its purely functional value, because humans decided throughout thousands of years of their existence that gold looks cool and they should hoard it). A cryptocurrency doesn't have any intrinsic value, and it doesn't have the legacy that gold enjoys.
It feels really weird that almost everyone I talked to who owns cryptocurrency has bought it as an investment and not because they need it to transact. It seems a lot of people are treating cryptocurrency like company stock or a commodity, and not a currency. So I feel that a lot of the current cryptocurrency value is just from speculative investor hoarding, and not real currency transactions involving goods and services. And I feel that a crash is inevitable as the speculators initiate the dump snowball
Most of the arguments here are also provided for Gold and gold gained lots of value after 2008 as people panicked and doubted the reliability financial system. It is still up a lot but lost quiet from the top. People who didn't doubt; they made good money.
Today's financial system is not perfect but it allows capital movement to enable economical growth. people gave up on Gold hoarding because it doesn't improve economy so same will happen with any currency. You need to be able to keep your assets dynamic and fluid just like cash hence we need a banking system and hence we need government control to ensure trust in the banking system.
The only benefit digital currency is distributed transaction processing and I am not sure how this is useful. Credit card companies provide this service with very low cost.
cryptocurrency is simply a digital form of currency. The underlying technology, blockchain, is simply a digital ledger that verifies the authenticity and origin of the transactions between all parties involved publicly to eliminate/minimize disputes. This means that when a transaction takes place between 2 parties, there are multiple sources/servers there to record the transaction publicly. So in case of a dispute, the audit trail will obtain the digital ledger from all the recording sources to settle the event....An analogy to this would be a "high fault tolerance" in IaaS/PaaS
The value proposition to cryptocurrency is the level of transparency, decentralization of the current banking system, and how unregulated (for now) it is-- as close to a true form of free market as possible.
Virtual currencies are perfect examples of that common "backed by nothing" criticism of fiat currencies. Except that criticism is wrong.... Traditional currencies have government-enforced regional monopolies and government-enforced demand (taxation).
Virtual currencies are backed only by consensus. And that consensus is being eroded by unlimited supply.
So I think we're seeing a bubble, and I would hate to be holding a nontrivial amount of virtual currency when the bubble pops.
Gold has industrial and other value. Nothing has no value at all. Are any currencies still gold-backed??