Is it like FB/G where you interview as generalist and your packet goes to a hiring committee, or is it like Amazon where your hiring loop is constructed specifically by the hiring manager and they make the final call? Pm Yoe 3.5 Total yoe 11 Target TC: 305 Actual tc: 270 after stock bloodbath #pm #product #productmanager
The team matching is a little weird there. You don’t have a full picture into what’s available on the team before chatting with the team manager. So when they ask you “what are you interested in doing” and you don’t know what they have you’re flying a little blind.
Oh interesting. In my case I’d be joining under my former director who will be moving there soon. My main question I guess is how much influence he’d have in getting me an offer, vs it being all out of his control due to the generalist nature of the hiring process, like meta. I’m just worried that I’ll get some shitty interviewer that’s having a bad day and they sink my chances. We all know how that happens in these generalist type of hiring pipelines.
Lol yeah I’ve been there and understand. I don’t have insight on that but I’ll just say there were a lot of interviewers in my process so hopefully you don’t get a ton of people having a bad day.
The former. The packet gets shared with potential team leads sequentially i suppose.
Got it thanks. And how consistent are the interviewers with their ratings? Is it where the hiring process is still fairly immature so the subjective-ness of the interviewers is pretty high, or is it a fairly consistent bar? My guess is that it’s more leaning towards the former.
Not sure about that. Haven't been on the other side yet.