What’s your perception on software quality engineer role? Does it exist in your org?
Feb 11
24 Comments
In Red Hat we have many QE ppl, I feel like they are good mix of highly technical ppl to sometimes completely non tech ppl trying to learn and grow. Many of them are also great at complex programming that automates product testing and CI/CD. Due to nature of Red Hat products many QEs become expert at DevOps or sysadmin kind of stuff too, but I generally don’t understand is this common across industry or Red Hat is odd company in that regard ?
I’d say QE in Red Hat is basically SDET/Automation role you are mentioning, Red Hat had ran a poll last year and most people wanted to be called SQE instead of SDET because that was mouthful.
#vmware #snap #google #tech #Oracle #adobe #robinhood #Tesla
comments
Why would devs hate QA people? They make devs work much easier and probably do a better job at testing than a dev can do. A dev who wrote the code would be biased since they know the underlying implementation. Having another person writing tests would definitely catch more issues
Google basically split the roles between test eng and sde in eng productivity in order to make the role guidelines and expectations more clear.
I’m not sure I fully seen what you are describing but the code I seen from some engineers do clean up their work but it’s still at a low level of what I like to do.
I believe code should be self healing.
I don’t really mean AI/ML level but I do think that when we test for example a pod deployment in openshift, that the code should integrate pod failure logs and attempt to run “healing” fixes to make sure it works. Things like that.
I really want to automate myself out of a job so I can move into the next more advance topics.
Please move out of that stank hole asap
Bureaucracy, politics, bad talent, company malpractices, low compensation, low efficiency, bad products (just beat the drum about openshift and rhel)… phew. The list isn’t going to end anytime soon