Negative signals/warning signs/red flags from company interviews

New
eo4u🤪💪🏻

New

eo4u🤪💪🏻
May 15, 2021 27 Comments

Hey all,
As a candidate, what are some of the top warning signs/negative signals/red flags that the company you’re interviewing at demonstrate that show the org might be problematic and dysfunctional? I was once super naive and didn’t see these warning signs and as a result got burned super badly at TOXIC and dysfunctional companies. Never again. Just wanted to get everyone’s feedback. For me personally, the top signs that a company is problematic/toxic/dysfunctional are:

• Interviewers not showing up. Worse if MULTIPLE interviewers did not show up. DURING ONSITES.
• Multiple extremely long interviews with many different people. I’m talking > 5+ interview panels. Worse if it’s with multiple people who you would realistically never interact with in this role.
* Interviewers who are super new at the company (e.g., joined 2 months ago). Worse if majority is new.
* Requests for additional interviews upon completion of onsite, esp if the on-site was already super intense and involved to begin with (see above re: meeting w >5+ people on-site). I get trying to find the right fit, but if you can’t decide even after such a long process, it demonstrates indecisiveness, lack of clarity, and insecurity on the leadership side— all recipes for disaster.
* Interviewers had extremely different ideas from each other on what the position would entail. Worse if these people are actually on the same team or within the same department 😂
* Lack of clarity on who you would be reporting to.
* Repeated mentions and emphasis on how “unique” and “special” their org and company is, and how it’s “not for everyone”— basically how grateful you should feel to be among the RARE CHOSEN ONES. Examples: WeWork, Shopify, [insert cult name 😂]
* Bait and switch— offer you a significantly different job than the one you interviewed for.
* Aggressive down-leveling (don’t believe promises that they think you would be promoted quickly— it’s all lies)
* Hiring manager leaves the company before the interview process is over (yes, had happened to me before)
* Emphasis on significant stakeholder management for a non-manager position. Translation: there is huge misalignment on leadership side and they want you to fix it. You will never be able to fix it.
* Interrogating and drilling the candidate on trivial irrelevant details (e.g., why is your resume not exactly the same as your LinkedIn?!—> ummm maybe some of us haven’t updated our LinkedIn yet?! #WTF 😂)
* Non-technical HM (as in, no experience at all in tech before and no basic tech literacy at a high level) for a technical role
* Exploding offers. Expecting someone to
make a decision as huge as a career under intense time pressure (e.g., 24-48 hours). Worse if company already KNOWS that the candidate has family and relocation considerations.
* Requiring INTENSE take-home challenges (advertised as should “only” take 4 hours = at least 10 hours) + hour-long PRESENTATION during on-site to 10+ people (including people who you would never interact with) + 4 rounds of LC, in different programming languages, for tech screen + 3 rounds of LC and whiteboarding DURING on-site
* Interviewers staring at you blankly when you ask about WLB.

For me, companies who exhibited these behaviors usually demonstrate a lack of respect for candidates and are usually highly dysfunctional.

Other people’s experiences?

#interview #tech #knowledgeispower #collectivewisdom #PTSD

comments

Want to comment? LOG IN or SIGN UP
TOP 27 Comments
  • I remember asking about WLB at AWS and my interviewer and his shadow looked at each other and chuckled. Never had a forced smile leave my face so quickly.
    May 15, 2021 4
    • New
      eo4u🤪💪🏻

      New

      eo4u🤪💪🏻
      OP
      The thing is if the culture doesn’t value WLB and sees working 996 to be the norm, you will be rated lower when they stank-rank and you’ll be seen as a slacker/not as committed as others, even if you are significantly more productive and efficient and objectively have better quality output than others. This is esp true if the company has URA quotas each year (which is honestly the most stupid thing I’ve ever heard). Performance review a lot of times is not based on the quality of your actual work but rather on manager’s (often biased) perception of you as a worker and how well you fit into the cultural norm. I learned this the hard way.
      May 15, 2021
    • Zillow Group / Eng
      fyifviu48

      Go to company page Zillow Group Eng

      fyifviu48
      Objectively false. I got two lateral promotions and a L4 ➡️ L5 promotion while leaving my laptop at the office every afternoon (when not oncall). Rarely worked more than 10am-5:30pm. Reviews constantly glowing. Forte feedback great.
      May 15, 2021
  • Interviewed at a place that spent the entire phone interview telling me about their product and asked nothing about my experience. Was also 15 min late. Hard pass for me.

    Edit: To add on to this; it was a Friday morning and they were drinking a white claw during the interview.
    May 15, 2021 2
    • New
      eo4u🤪💪🏻

      New

      eo4u🤪💪🏻
      OP
      That sounds awful. Sometimes companies forget that interviewing is a 2-way street.
      May 15, 2021
    • Cisco
      mAwg00

      Go to company page Cisco

      mAwg00
      Sounds awful though I might give them points for drinking a white claw during the interview
      May 15, 2021
  • Square
    tqFS46

    Go to company page Square

    tqFS46
    Interviewer for a well-known company once mentioned in passing that “you will work some late nights and weekends here” as we were going through a case 😬
    May 15, 2021 4
    • New
      eo4u🤪💪🏻

      New

      eo4u🤪💪🏻
      OP
      Yikes! Yeah I’ve heard not so great things about DD (a while ago tho, maybe it has changed?). Anyway, you def dodged a bullet! 👌🏻
      May 15, 2021
    • Square
      tqFS46

      Go to company page Square

      tqFS46
      This was within the past year. I appreciated their honesty, at least 😅
      May 15, 2021
  • Zillow Group / Eng
    fyifviu48

    Go to company page Zillow Group Eng

    fyifviu48
    Lack of clarity on the specifics about the position
    May 15, 2021 2
    • New
      eo4u🤪💪🏻

      New

      eo4u🤪💪🏻
      OP
      Do you find this to happen more often with “newer” roles or newer teams/departments? That was certainly the case for me.
      May 15, 2021
    • Zillow Group / Eng
      fyifviu48

      Go to company page Zillow Group Eng

      fyifviu48
      I genuinely can't say because I don't think I was even given a position until 6 months after I started..
      May 15, 2021
  • Cisco
    Trvth

    Go to company page Cisco

    Trvth
    I asked this last night: Check out this post! "Interview Red Flags (Tech Industry)"
    https://us.teamblind.com/s/FkQYcZop
    May 15, 2021 1
    • New
      eo4u🤪💪🏻

      New

      eo4u🤪💪🏻
      OP
      Great minds think alike 😉.
      May 15, 2021