Big changes in the CNN New Hampsire polling results compared to prior polling. "Top tier" candidates disappearing. Biggest increases Klobuchar (+5)π, Gabbard (+4)π, Yang (+4)π Biggest drops Biden (-9)π€, Harris (-6) π€ Sanders in a slight leadπ. Which candidate would do best against Trump?
History speaks that these polls mean jackshit
I agree. Part of the intention of showing the large changes was also that the earlier ones did not provide much insight. The interesting thing is that the polling has been used to filter out candidates from the debate stages. This excludes people from free visibility before anyone has had a chance to vote.
Yang supporters don't own a land line or have no idea what that is, so yea these polls are really shit and a tool for the Media to manipulate the voters.
Wow, looks like it's trump 2020.
I think Tulsi can beat trump and would actually pull a small portion of people who voted for Trump. πWhen the last Dem nominee calls you a Russian spy forces news to change the news articles to change the story, they forget we have audio recordings. The party officials only want candidates they can buy out or will continue business as usual.
She has too much anti-LGBTQ baggage to be a serious candidate.
Doesnβt pooling show that most of the candidates would beat Trump? We donβt need to guess.
Do you have references with large samples? Polling showed Hillary would beat Trump. Lots of trump voters did not publicly say they were going to vote for him, but made the trip to the ballot and voted for him. I'm not looking for confirmation bias, but objective data on which candidate would do best lined up with Trump.
She actually beat him by 3 million votes
sanders or buttigieg!!!!