Saw many posts that a typical E6 facebook offer looks like: 230k base, 1.2M rsu over 4 years and sign-on 100k. So avg would be 230+300+25=555k. However from what I understand, there will be yearly refresher that will be equally vested in the next four years from the grant date. Let's say it is 200k / year. If so you would get like 200+150+100+50=500k more for 4 years or avg 125k / year. If so, is this correct that the actual average TC for the above offer would be 675k instead ? Google L6 on the other hand is something like 250k base, 850k rsu (front loaded 33-33-22-12%), 50k sign on. Assume that refreshers are the same as facebook, then the offer would be (1.2M-850k+100k-50k-20k*4) = 320k less compared for Facebook one over four years? Am i missing anything? It seems that the front loading vesting schedule is a scam ?
Meta had a higher chance for pip. Maybe 1/3 chance a new e6 cannot survive. You need to consider that
What if you leave after 2 years? Also factor in quarterly vs monthly vesting.
Yep, got offers from Google twice, consistently worse if you consider total earnings over a 4 year period
Meta is the exception and not the norm They truly reward best performers
Idk your math doesn't work out. Assuming you want to calculate things only over the first 4 years. The only thing that's different is the RSUs and base. So (1.2m - 850k) / 4 = 87.5k more in RSU - 20k in base per year = 50k or so in difference per year. Idk how you did your math, but Meta's 675k - 320k is not even in the same ballpark.
India
3h
483
I hope none of you ever gets a GC
Cars
Yesterday
690
Car accident at my fault, how to avoid paying the damages?
World Conflicts
Yesterday
455
Noam Chomsky's Take on Hamas
2024 Presidential Election
3d
44010
There’s going to be an emergency shut down
Personal Finance
Yesterday
884
Hit new milestone: 1.4M at 29F
damn. i really gotta get back into the market huh