No...no way! An improvement in high level languages? I was developing a new programming paradigm using imperative programming. The paradigm is a formal system defined in Smalltalk alone for now. Working and thinking in it led me to a conclusion I tried to resist: Context-Free Coding! Have you ever had a recursion problem? A problem with scoping variable? Not declared a dependency? Failed an integration test? Used a dozen nested arrays instead of a struct? Context-free coding is the evolution of object orientation. When OOP was new it was touted as a panacaea for all ills from architecture to overbyte. CFC takes the concept of clearly-defined interfaces to encapsulated routines to the next level by making a logical distinction between semantics and syntactics prior to everything else. Programs written with CFC will rarely have a bug¹, no matter how inexperienced or overworked you are. 1. Code written in CFC may not compile. This bug is acknowledged and will be addressed in a future release.
Lot of bullshit without any concrete example code. You talk a lot for someone who codes in small talk
👨🏽💻🤷🏽♂️
Nah. You just need to take context into account whenever appropriate. We should go deeper into FP and dependent types instead.
Sounds like you need DreamBerd: https://github.com/TodePond/DreamBerd---e-acc
I like it
TC (text compiler) or GTFO (get the fuck on it)
You're the only one who got it 🤣
Key word: "Code written in CFC may nor compile"
That doesn’t exclude the possibility that CFC is potentially an interpreted language
Tech Industry
Yesterday
2639
Quitting this Slave life
India
Yesterday
901
Modi is a legend, will be remembered for centuries to come
Working Parents
Yesterday
845
What do you think is wrong with a kid who got rejected by 9 colleges?
Tech Industry
Yesterday
2077
The end of Backdoor Roth?!
Tech Industry
Yesterday
272
Age recommendation for leadership role
printMerryXmas() { printMerryXmas(); }
eww camel case