Can she really be impartial in the case? https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/03/10/ketanji-jackson-harvard-affirmative-action-case/ “Jackson graduated from Harvard Law School and Harvard College, where she met her husband and has regularly returned to campus to teach a law school workshop, to serve on alumni panels and as a speaker to student organizations. She was an elected director of the alumni association for three years; a longtime member of the Harvard Club of D.C., through which she interviewed college applicants; and is a member of the Harvard Black Alumni Society. Her youngest daughter will be a freshman at Harvard in the fall.”
It won’t change anything. AA is going to be a thing of the past or crippled severely. But I’m pretty sure this institutes will invent some other version to circumvent it.
Does the text you're quoting have anything to do with affirmative action in some way I'm not seeing? Or is it "the implication" that you want us to be racist and see something that's not there?
The article is about whether the scotus can be impartial to the upcoming court case - it’s not about affirmative action itself. The quote is relevant because it is her connections that might make her biased.