Specifically from technology & Engineering point of view, how do they compare? If given the choice, which firm would you choose for better career growth and better exit opportunities? Am a new grad, interned at GS. So I know a little bit about GS. In my experience, GS hires the smartest people and pays them top notch to do mediocre day to day tasks and support the front office. The profiles they hire are all kinda generalists as far as I have seen, even analysts and associates in my team were generalists and didn't specialize in one particular thing. But when I see openings at JPMC, they have different opening for each niche roles within engineering like Backend, Frontend, Fullstack, Infra, Data Eng., etc. and even the JD of each sounds like it might be useful in building expertise in one niche skill within Software Engineering and have better exit opportunities. #JPMorgan #GoldmanSachs #UBS #Citi #Citadel #Engineering #Career #Software
Tech Industry
Yesterday
930
Rate my offers!
Tech Industry
3d
32446
What happens when most of your team is Indian?
World Conflicts
Yesterday
1191
Why do Indians support Israel so much( on blind surprisingly) when Israel really thinks 💩of them ?
India
Yesterday
881
Ideal indian parents
Software Engineering Career
Yesterday
465
If your team does daily standups, your manager is a micromanager
GS on your resume has a better relative cachet. JPMC, not so much. Unless it's a quant/strat role, in which case, it's more or less similar. Eventually, though, your learning will take you much further than any company name will, so that should be a higher priority, and IMO GS is a better place for that. It's the more nimble organisation of the two, and that provides you opportunities that JPMC never can. Also, smarter people at GS than JPMC.