What are the differences between these tree cloud options? Why a company would choose the one over the other two? What are some advantages and disadvantages?
But he wants our opinion. Why not provide it? Reality is: technically, differences are small. A startup: go for Amazon. If you are a large customer, then Microsoft and Amazon will battle for you, and Google is recently joining that battle. Pick whatever provides you the best deal. Cruise for a year, and threat to leave, so your deal is reviewed.
Thanks </div>
I'm curious why you believe that a startup company should lean towards AWS?
And remember if you go GCP, they can blacklist your company because your kid resold the wrong version of the Nexus, or they may get bored and deprecate your DB because they built a better one that uses ML to inject ads into your data or something.
azure sucks. gcp still new. aws. always
IaaS is pretty much a commodity now, so if that's what you want go with the cheapest. But you'll prob want to take advantage of PaaS as well. So look at the different PaaS offerings each one offers and see which ones meet your needs best. For example, if you want to host web apps, Azure Web Apps is the golden standard. I'm sure there are other PaaS services which Amazon does better. See what you think you'll use the most
If you are on MS stack - Azure seems to be the best. Java - AWS or Google. As for me Google has better end-to-end PaaS offering. It is limited though, but whatever they provide looks great. If small startup - I would go Google. If you are big enterprise and need advanced IaaS - go AWS.
The fuck do we look like-Gartner analysts? Go google that shit
Oh I didn't know I could google it! Also I forgot: Blind is only for posting salary questions .. miserable people..
Nope, just a troll. Doing my thang - figured it was my chance to shine!