Which role would be tolerant of a person endowed with high calibre of language abilities, but prone to producing occasional bugs? (repost due to lack of sufficient votes in other poll... it's easier to ask for forgiveness than permission)
Would suggest something that's offline (i.e not user facing) and not mission critical to the company. Why not be better with bugs?
QA job creator
Almost any role. I'm not saying you will be good though. If you're around for long enough, you will see devs, qa, PMs, EMs, and even directors who add negative value but somehow are able convince the right people that they're valuable.
Just write tests for your code?
Sloppy dev won't think of the important test cases.
World Conflicts
Yesterday
637
Peaceful Protest Hasn’t Worked and Has Been Met With Aggression.
Tech Industry
Yesterday
866
Is meta really worth the wait?
Tech Industry
Yesterday
793
PM is irrelevant role and will die in next 2-3 years.
Ask Blinders
Yesterday
2051
How big are the balls of Google to lay off thousands and then do 70 BILLION in stock buyback?
Cars
2d
695
Best outdoorsy SUV?
PM
Not even that. It means they are now setting up teams for failure.
Almost alll PMs produce shitty requirements and cause more bugs long term than engineers could ever dream of. OP is ideal fit.