Meta E5 On-site Evaluation

I recently went through the on-site loop with Meta. I’m wondering if any current or former Meta employees can shed some light on how my interview performance might be evaluated. It wasn’t my best showing but not horrible either IMHO. TPS: 2 coding questions — knocked it out of the park, got to the optimal solution for both without any assistance. Onsite: - Coding 1: 2 questions — needed some hand holding to get to the solution for the first question but I solved the second question more or less without help but then the interviewer asked me to make a language-specific update that I didn’t understand initially but we ended up getting there although I don’t think my code was production ready after that refactor. - Coding 2: 2 questions — solved the first part of the first question without any help but needed some hand holding to solve a follow up. For the second question, I needed a hint to get to the solution. - Behavioral: typical — nailed it, interviewer seemed really happy with my answers to their questions and follow ups. - System Design: typical — nailed it, interviewer seemed very content with my design choices and I was able to lead the entire discussion with the interviewer just asking some clarifying questions about decisions along the way. What do you think the feedback will be? Does TPS feedback come into play at all? I’m hoping maybe my strong showing there makes up for the weaker showing in the on-site coding rounds. I’ve also heard of redos of certain rounds if feedback is mixed. How does that work? Is a coding round redo possible? UPDATE: heard back about two weeks after my loop that it was a close/split decision but ultimately a reject. I wasn’t offered any additional feedback. TC: ~$400k YOE: 8