Salary comp bt Amzn, Goog, Msft, Fb
Saw this article comparing top tech company salaries: https://blog.step.com/2016/04/08/an-open-source-project-for-tech-salaries/ Does this look right to you? The number seems about right for Microsoft, btw. This is not accounting Seattle/cali cost difference
Step.com
SDE 3 is wrong more like 250-300
I was told that amazon sde 3 is more like l64 at Microsoft. Amazon sde 3 generally had 8+ years experience and shipped multiple projects as tech lead. Is this true?
64 at MS make that, on average all in. Looks right to me.
Then you're underpaid. Ask your HR rep for your comparative ratio. Guarantee you're below 1.0.
I don't understand, G pays the same for l3 and l4? Doesn't make sense.
My thought exactly
What is the difference between E5 a d T5 at Google?
It is extremely wrong for Principal MS. They have one data point in the XLS for that band and it's someone at the low end of L65, yet it's labeled as 65-67 (which overall is much closer to the others there).
65 at MS is like 250k overall comp, 66 would be like 325-375k
325-430K -- range allows u to go till that
We like to work at MICROSOFT not because of the pay, but because of the raise we get when we leave.
This is wrong for MSFT principal because it straddles folks who get 75K stock(L65) , 145K(L66) and 300K stock(L67). Bonus also varies significantly.
This has been shared before. It's also not accurate for MS. The average, per HR, for salary is higher for level 63, much less 64. Bonus figures also fall short in my experience, where you get about 30%, or > $45K, annually. This still means we're behind the others, but not quite as much as depicted.
To clarify, you get 30% bonus (cash and stock) for being average 63 or 64.
30% is for top performance. 15 for averagr