US Government Collaborating with Open AI, Google, Alphabet leaders for AI Security??!
https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/openais-sam-altman-and-other-tech-leaders-to-serve-on-ai-safety-board-7dc47b78?st=xggtkj1be488ozw&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink What are your guys' thoughts on this? On one hand I think it makes sense that the government really needed help with AI leaders especially when it comes to threats, but at the same time I wonder how the government and these types of private institutions are going to start to collaborate more to exert control over the country and it also scares me and makes me think it is a bit fishy at the same time... What do you think? Good move? Something we should be concerned about?
The big players are trying to erect barriers to smaller competitors and open source, while the government is looking for ways to circumvent the first amendment in the name of âsafetyâ. Different goals, similar tools, but at the end the little guy loses.
If government is involved especially democrats and deep state you can bet they are just looking for new ways to abuse and violate citizens rights and launder money.
1. The Deep State does not exist. Keep your paranoia to yourself. 2. You must be confused, Republicans are the corrupt ones who launder money and violate people's rights.
Your response is so ignorant I canât tell if youâre joking. âDeep state doesnât existâ đ€Ł đ đ€Ą
This is clearly about weaponizing AI. Probably why Sam Altman was let go earlier. Their board at the time comprised of ethicists in AI, the. They were all replaced when he was brought back. And now we're learning about how AI is being used to actively target and destroy
Whatâs new? They collaborated before and they continue to. Nothing extra is a reason for concern if you were not concerned before.
Lol if you're a US citizen then find a role that sponsors clearance and find out for yourself instead of speculating?
Why are they collaborating with CEOs instead of experts? Instead of people with deep expertise in engineering the thing they're afraid of, they put safety in the hands of people who profit from the tech and appear to have an extreme conflict of interest in that they benefit in the extreme from forbidding potential competition?
This is called "regulatory capture" and it's terrible for innovation.
Also how is the same clown involved with border security handling AI policy? He doesn't understand either of them
More like AI survalience
Add one more option - very fishy
very fishy, and very expected, we know they're butt buddies with Microsoft and have em add backdoors every now and then
Very fishy