The conclusions are based solely on observations, resulting in errors. Status-pro guys - These guys have achieved a lot in their careers, married a beautiful girl only because their wife is their trophy, love their status, and speak less. He thinks 100 times before mixing with his wife's friends and in-laws' family. Friendly guys - these guys easily blend in with their in-laws and their wife's friend circle. They have a fondness for talking a lot. While looking for a spouse, they have no particular preference for their looks, but their career is also quite good, similar to the first one. Flirtatious guys - these guys didn't marry the girl of their dreams, they did adjust. Their careers are also good, like the two above. Beautiful girls are always checked out by them when they are at a party. Although they flirt discreetly, their wife is a constant source of fear for them. Cranky guys - these men didn't marry the girl of their dreams. They are similar to flirty but cranky, with lots of fights and abuse. Both are dissatisfied. alpha guys: these guys have great careers, married their love of life (if they are beautiful or not doesnโt matter) they have great marriage and great careers. They set clear boundaries for their family- they have high ambitions and goals.. and itโs way above a women. (Special thanks to @nehdudks)
Ok angel priya
Oki thanks ๐
Is the gyaaan ever going to stop?
It's a funny observation with a lot of errors, not gyan.
Itโs a lot of bad judgement
There are alpha Indian men: Indian men who have great careers, married their love of life (if they are beautiful or not doesnโt matter) they have great marriage and great careers. They set clear boundaries for their family- they have high ambitions and goals.. and itโs way above a women.
Yes, nice one.. I am adding it. Thank you ๐
You are welcome - An Alpha man!
Ok doctor sahib
Would get way more attraction and likes if about Indian woman
Noted. I would definitely think about it.
What about rajesh?
Go to sleep Pajeet.
Is this Pajeet a khalistani?
Hehe ๐โฆ I am not Pajeet. It's a funny observation with a lot of errors.