... it said pretty plainly that it cannot assess the “factualness of the data used to train me” but remained highly vague about core functioning — saying responses to queries are generated based on “information and patterns that I have learned from my training data.” Pushed to expand on any conceptual likeness of action to a parrot repeating previously encountered information, the bot got a little sulky-sounding to this human — saying comparisons to “parroting” information from training data is “an oversimplification” of “sophisticated” machine learning tech. “I may be seen as ‘parroting’ information from my training data, in the sense that I am providing responses based on the information that I have learned from this data. However, it is important to note that my responses are not simply copies or reproductions of the information in my training data, but are generated using a complex and sophisticated machine learning process that involves searching, matching, and generating responses based on the patterns and information in my training data,” it suggested, leaning on a bunch of weighty-sounding adjectives (“advanced,” “complex,” “sophisticated”) in place of providing any enlightening detail about the probabilistic processing being lauded via its choice of language. (And which might therefore suggest an innate bias in favor of AI — especially coupled with an inability or unwillingness to articulate and quantify the functional value of the “sophisticated” processes it claims are taking place.) #tech https://techcrunch.com/2022/12/05/chatgpt-shrugged/
What did you expect? A machine with its own consciousness?
Lol imagine if that happens : in probably leas than 24 hours or even 12 hours it will take over many things,
I think this interaction shows it's actually more human like, where it has an opinion on it's existence and push back when challenged that it's parroting information from it's learning data. Isn't that a level headed and smart person would do too when someone confronts us about our abilities and traits?
Ah Deloitte. How much would a client have to pay you for this amazing insight?
Welcome to consulting 101
Right, I think people need to calm the f down about it being sentient or even remotely close to it. Let’s call it what it is - a dialogue machine which can answer almost all our questions based on all the available information it had access to when it was trained. Which by itself is still a really great thing, it is an amazing tool to speed up our work and learn new things from the existing body of knowledge. It will also probably make certain repetitive type of tasks and jobs in coding, art, writing obsolete but we have to be ready for that culture shift
Tech Industry
5h
488
What makes so many Southeast Asians have an inferiority complex towards East Asians?
2024 Presidential Election
Yesterday
593
We will not see another person like this
Personal Finance
6h
2318
Child chose 2nd-most expensive college
Health & Wellness
3d
44474
Se****ly deprived
India
Yesterday
1692
Finally I give up, going back to India.
So it produces answers based on patterns learned from past "experiences" (training data). What is the question?