Quarterly evaluation processes are common in many companies. For me, although arduous, allocating time every 3 months to just sit and parse through what I've done, what I've wanted to do, and how this fits into my current or developing role has proven immensely valuable for ongoing career growth. Still, it feels inefficient to complete. Naturally, a thought follows... Has anyone experienced or worked in a system that took note of most things you did and attempted a correlation with business significance or impact? Would this, taken to the extreme, even be better than a more manual, human-centric review?
Evals are the most important things for your career. I wouldn’t trust any tool to automate that task away. Process: 1. Jot down everything you’ve worked on at the end of every week 2. Condense them into themes at review time, and tie them to larger business impact 3. Pick the themes that most relate to the next level in your career ladder and those for promotions 4. Pick the themes that have the most business impact and use those for raises and salary negotiation
Just run analytics on Git checkins and associated JIRA bugs
Working Parents
Yesterday
949
What do you think is wrong with a kid who got rejected by 9 colleges?
Tech Industry
Yesterday
2835
Quitting this Slave life
Working Parents
14h
1090
Closed now - thank you all
Tech Industry
2d
8022
Binance founder is going to PRISON
India
Yesterday
1004
Modi is a legend, will be remembered for centuries to come
Ezsnippets at Google summarizes your week to you. Then it gets a bit easier to go through those weekly summaries to make a quarterly summary.