A: no worker protections, no legally mandated severance, 500k TC B: minimum 4 month severance (unless performance based) for any layoffs, max 45h workweek, 175k TC C: no layoffs possible, easy work, no moonlighting possible, 90k TC 375 + paper money
It’s weird to have A and B in comparison. Who will leave an extra 325k every year for a one-off 60k when they are laid off?
I intended for a key feature of B to be workweek protections as well. Plenty of high TC jobs (esp outside tech) have shitty hours.
Because there's no loyalty by corporations as it is. It's better to collect as much money as possible as soon as possible because tomorrow is a new day and could be the day you're laid off.
You will never be able to retire on C. It will take 30 years to afford a home on B. Only option is A. Do A for as long as possible. Hopefully you save enough to buy a home, retire, and then just enjoy life. To be honest... I highly doubt B and C will never ask you to do more than 40 or 45 hours. My guess is that you will get pushed to do as much as job A ... only for a lot less money. So you may as well take A and make enough money to say fu to your employer and work in a few years and enjoy a long retirement.
I have A but with the benefits of B and C