Well, it's not tech side of the industry. I saw a few campaign management slots open up recently there, and having a decade in senior roles(nationally, party and special interest). And honestly, I figured blind would be best way to find a solid Ref for it. The political industry is anti-vape and I really want to get into slamming them during the election season.
Vaporized nicotine changes DNA structure in esophageal cells. Not good.
I haven't seen any scholarly citings supporting that claim, what I do see is yes much of the nicotine is transferred in the esophageal cells, and that in any USP grade formulas that there is no issue after 45 minutes.
😂 this guy is perfect for the job
Do you vape then?
Yeah since around 2012. I'm alive and kicking. Dropped a 3 pack a day habit.
I don't know man. I don't smoke nor do I vape regularly. You do you .
I wouldn’t join Juul anymore than I’d join Fry’s at this point.
Well, that is perfectly fine, I personally see DC as something so disconnected, where for the past decade they have created homophobic associations to vaping for the 7 . That it's an incredibly hostile environment for it, and as a person who has Vaped during that time, they are being targeted. I personally am passionate about it, and want to defend it. I have seen it called a career killer from Politicos, but they also told me fighting for Canabis rights was one as well, and here I am today. Personally, I chose to believe in technology and the future it creates, and that we adapt to conditions as new evidence presents itself. The evidence is clear that it is a safer alternative, even when regarding the esophageal absorbtion. Comparing numbers from the tobacco studies or even some cities, vaping is much safer, and that's been proven time and time again. Just because their are low levels of a chemical doesn't mean it's harmful it means it's there, and if you have to choose and apple or a safer orange, you choose the orange. No one really eats a truly "natural" almond, it's hit with radiation to kill the cyanide, there are trace but safe levels of cyanide in the organic industry, should be banning organic almonds because of that? No. Do I choose the safer GE Almond that grows without cyanide, absolutely. Technology has allowed us to choose safer alternatives time and time again. No one says nicotine is safe, but it is less toxic and addictive than caffeine. We choose to use these things, it's. It forced. Given the choice I will choose progress over stagnation due to hyperbole and fearmogering any day of the week.
Woah.
DM for a referral. I work on the people s
Why are you trying to kill people?
You see it as killing, I don't. Nicotine addiction has been proven time and time again safer than caffeine.
Now if you are referencing the recent vaping deaths, that have yet to be shown to be caused by any major vape company. And are because of strict cannabis regulations in many states causing them to get cheap fake cartridges