PoliticsJul 15, 2019

Best President ever.

Only president in recent times who has guts to enforce the immigration laws as they should be. Applying for asylum should occur either in own country or first neighbour country. Also along with border agents at entry point, there always should be three judges present, who will decide the case on the spot before someone enters USA. Judges must consult border sheriff and not able to impose decision. If too many people gather on border then they wait in current country. Only those who get approved should be allowed to enter. Enough.

Carvana hot hot 🔥 Jul 15, 2019

“Applying for asylum should occur either in own country or first neighbour country.”... so you’re saying what here??

New
griesrt1 Jul 15, 2019

Seems clear to me. If you’re from El Salvador then you apply for asylum into the US from El Salvador or in a neighboring country.

Snapchat Tonban Jul 15, 2019

You are running from El Salvador, how can you seek asylum from there. BS.

Apple TimCuckold Jul 15, 2019

Amen! the only problem I have with trump so far is local tax deduction. But fuck the local tax! California has been taken tens of billions of corporate tax why should I still need to pay?

McAfee mIrt65 Jul 15, 2019

The simple solution to the “local tax issue” is to move. Plenty of no or low tax localities out there. If you want to live in a mentally ill state then be prepared for the bill.

Salesforce Usbj01 Jul 15, 2019

All countries are first neighbor to some country, so by induction.....

Cruise Automation cruise’in Jul 15, 2019

This comment is dumb lol. Not all countries are places youd need to seek asylum from, hence the chain would end at one neighboring country. Asylum is for people fleeing their countries due to hardship, not fleeing because they feel like it

McAfee mIrt65 Jul 15, 2019

New Zealand? Australia? Induce how?

Oath Atinlay2 Jul 15, 2019

MAGA

Amazon Coatl Jul 15, 2019

“Applying for asylum should occur either in own country or first neighbour country.” When I think about asylum laws, I imagine if they would have helped jews escape Nazi Germany, so with that context, while I appreciate an option of applying in an embassy (which is not an option in order to make asylum more difficult), I find this exact proposal awful.

Oath Atinlay2 Jul 15, 2019

It discourages people from taking an unnecessary dangerous journey.

Amazon Coatl Jul 15, 2019

Ohh I agree, I just don’t think they should be the only options, as they wouldn’t have helped jews escape Nazi Germany, which in my opinion is like the bare minimum an asylum law should do.

Amazon Gjdyveycc4 Jul 15, 2019

Also he said that 4 congresswomen should go back to their home country, so next is to send all non white females back to their country of origin ?

Expedia e2t2 OP Jul 15, 2019

If these congresswomen are supporting law breakers then they should be punished as any accomplice would be. If someone has taken oath of allegiance to protect this country from any current or future, perceived or clear threat, then do that duty diligently. Anyone supporting southern border invaders is not a well wisher of this country.

Microsoft TrumpWins Jul 15, 2019

Also one of those congresswomen failed to condemn Al Qaeda, so is the next step to allow open borders to allow Al Qaeda free entry into the country?

Microsoft CevicheMix Jul 15, 2019

Didnt Obama deport more than Trump?

Expedia e2t2 OP Jul 15, 2019

Yep. Many more than few prior Prez combined

Microsoft JDwb49 Jul 15, 2019

So Trump does not have the skill and the balls Obama had. Right?

Facebook public2 Jul 15, 2019

Sounds like you are referring to Obama?

Synchrony ———— Jul 15, 2019

You have no idea why and how all(almost) countries agreed for asylum treaty. Go figure first. Your whole argument is exact opposite of why this international law was enacted.

Expedia e2t2 OP Jul 15, 2019

Synch...it was needed in those times. Now it is abused so need to be reviewed.

Amazon maga2028 Jul 16, 2019

Trump is the best; vote for Trump in 2028!