While the world is hooked towards AI and GPU's, there are some interesting developments on the quantum side as this one: https://www.livescience.com/technology/computing/quantum-computers-could-overtake-classical-ones-within-2-years-ibm-benchmark-experiment-shows Besides cryptography, quantum computing seems capable of speeding up ML/AI workloads. Will this pull the rug from under the GPU dominance of the ML/AI market? If yes, what's the approximate timeline? #microsoft #ai #machinelearning #gcp #aws #nvidia
If the ECC is actually viable, then the fabrication companies would need to start quantum, but my guess is even if a product comes out it will be crazy expensive till someone figures out how to get it to economies of scale as much as semis, which would take decades mostly.
Just look at QBTS vs NVDA. Market doesn’t agree with you. They aren’t stupid.
The stupid MBA's and cocky traders working in wealth management and hedge funds may not have caught up with what's going on in the quantum side of things.
Market is sentimental fool 😂
Hard to scale a computer that requires superconductivity in cryogenic temperature to work. Not to mention it's extremely vulnerable to comedic radiation. It's going to be a while to market
Comedic radiation, is that when a neutron laughs its ass off after flipping ur quibit?
Genuinely curious, what is a critical and computational problem that can only be solved by ground breaking super computing performance?
Ibm to the 🌙
One complication is that when we talk about quantum, there are more than one kind of technology in development with their own pros and cons. For eg., IBM or D-Wave are not offering/working on the what these guys have reported: https://www.scmp.com/news/china/science/article/3223364/chinese-quantum-computer-180-million-times-faster-ai-related-tasks-says-team-led-physicist-pan?linker=1%2a55v8xw%2aclientId%2aaldjT1hpN24tTG1sN0JITFk5bGp5eWxtSEx5ZjVBaEh2elpqWEJ5S0k5UUdTbUVHSjhtQ1FoeHBYSW1QQmJkZQ..&_gl=1%2a11ievam%2a_ga%2aYW1wLVJGOXBfaWFocXFNVVFIUEcwd01ZZEJFWXlNMGREZ0xIOHlGUFJqWXh3Skh2MWgta09rRURIeEc0Y1RRSDJtTW8 And of course the first offering will be in the form of a cloud based service, not handheld devices, most viability issues can be resolved in a controlled environment. So the future might be closer than you think.
I want to believe. But videos by https://m.youtube.com/@SabineHossenfelder make me reconsider. Then again I’m not a physicist, so tell me why she’s wrong.
Can you say the same thing about all the different technologies under research at present?
I believe it is decades away. You can’t really do anything useful with today’s quantum computers. OpenAI and LLM analogy doesn’t hold, it would be more like speaking about LLMs 60 years ago when the biggest neural network consisted of a few perceptrons. We are talking about fundamental physics here, not just clever tweaks on existing algorithms like OpenAI did.
Health & Wellness
Yesterday
271
Lasik cost
Tech Industry
Yesterday
1959
What happens when most of your team is Indian?
Layoffs
Yesterday
883
At Tesla, even the interns are on the chopping block 🪓
Tech Industry
Yesterday
1159
Women, help me understand why this is inspirational
Working Parents
Yesterday
1478
Closed now - thank you all
Just like AIML in the past, it will be a long time before anything commercially useful emerges
Intel, I don’t agree with that comparison. That would be more like talking about chatgpt 50 years ago. Chatgpt didn’t happen overnight.