Meta Product Architecture Interview

There are a lot posts asking the difference between product architecture & system design rounds at Meta. To me this is a signal that though there are some helpful answers, what is expected is still vague. I think I figured it out, but please correct me if I’m wrong because I HAVE NOT HAD THIS INTERVIEW YET. It seems to me the difference between the two happens during the “deep dive” portion. —— interview structure —— 1. FR/ NFR: Define functional/ nonfunctional requirements 2. Core Entities: List the entities outlined in FR. 3. API: Define API contracts that solve FR and return core entities. 4. HLD: One by one, create E2E flow from client to DB for each API endpoint. Which would have resulted in: - A complete, yet not scalable system - High level convos about “why this and not that” - Convos about auth, scopes, firewalls - Schema design - A high level understanding of the system 5. Deep dive Instead of diving deep with 2-3 opportunities to SCALE/ meet NFR (like sys design), you find 2-3 opportunities to show mid tier - client side chops by solving user focused problems based on NFR. —— example deep dives —— 1. How can you use UI/ UX to solve for a NFR, and what priority does this have? (Virtual waiting queue experience for T Swift tickets/ distributed lock experience) 2. How do you solve a NFR for all users, everywhere (3g - 5g)? 3. What are some monetization strategies (a stretch maybe)? 4. How can you use HTTP caching/ browser caching to free up bandwidth, improve latency, ensure availability? 5. How do you display paginated data with user experience in mind? Would you use key set or offset pagination? 6. How can you make adding future features easy to add to existing system? Are your APIs set up to add new endpoints for new features? 7. How can you improve the time to interactive with the system’s requirements? 8. How are we monitoring users, and how are we making decisions based on their behaviors (new features, bugs, UX improvements) etc… ——— conclusion ——— Can people with experience with this interview weigh in? There are too many unanswered questions regarding this interview, and having a more defined answer would help a lot of folks. ——— miscellaneous ——— TC: 0 YOE: 7

Poll
1 Participant
Select only one answer
New
specreserv Mar 25

Very interested in this. Lots of content on system design, little to no content on product architecture interviews. Also interested in how to signal E6 in such an interview

HashiCorp XaVl73 OP Mar 25

If my assumption is correct then I imagine the signal for E6 would be how deep you dive. My advice based on my neurotic level research is get step 1-4 out of the way as quickly as possible. Give your self a lot of time to really show your expertise in step 5. I believe the expectation is that 1-4 is baseline expectation, you need to have a working system, but some components can be abstracted out and discussed. https://www.hellointerview.com/learn/system-design/answer-keys/tweet-search#staff Also read this if you haven’t already. https://www.hellointerview.com/blog/meta-system-vs-product-design

Illumio tobewho Mar 25

Hey could share resources you are using to prepare? Also any place to take mock interview for SD?

HashiCorp XaVl73 OP Mar 25

This is an unhelpful comment. There are plenty of posts outlining the questions you are asking.