PoliticsOct 27, 2019
Amazonsako

Sondland confirms quid pro quo

Ambassador who arranged the meeting says that the meeting between Trump and the Ukrainian leader was conditional on Ukraine investigating Biden, corroborating Taylor's testimony to the same. So Trump traded access and $400mil in tax dollars to have a foreign state collude with his own personal lawyer to attack his political rival and influence a US election. https://thehill.com/homenews/house/467607-sondland-told-house-there-was-a-ukraine-quid-pro-quo-report?amp

WSJ: Sondland told the House that Trump's Ukraine pressure was a quid pro quo
WSJ: Sondland told the House that Trump's Ukraine pressure was a quid pro quo
TheHill
Intel cruelaa Oct 27, 2019

Yup, make Merica Third World again !

Google 나의 나라 Oct 27, 2019

When you run a country like you run a business, everything is negotiable and tit-for-tat, right?

Microsoft __Ranveer Oct 27, 2019

Let me bring up the best defense any trumpster can offer without batting an eyelid - FAKE NEWS

Salesforce barnacles Oct 27, 2019

To add to that - WITCH HUNT!!

Microsoft __Ranveer Oct 27, 2019

oh and I almost forgot DEEP STATE

Amazon sako OP Oct 27, 2019

A bunch of Trump ninnies had been dutifully regurgitating the talking points, "Taylor's testimony is hearsay, who did Taylor hear it from, it's hearsay!" Well now we know who he heard it from, guess the T-Tards are choking on that line now, wonder what new talking point they will get? Will it be Clinton's emails, something to do with Hunter Biden? Anything but actually face the facts of this case!

Microsoft Harmar Oct 27, 2019

Maybe they’ll bring back Benghazi.

Instasize cplus Oct 27, 2019

Great, let me know when we can see the full transcripts of everyone interviewed. Good luck

Addepar snert Oct 27, 2019

Can't wait to see where the goal posts move to now

Intel cruelaa Oct 27, 2019

How does he know there was quid pro quo ? Did T mouth those words?

Amazon sako OP Oct 27, 2019

He was the one who set up the meeting, and was directed by Trump to do so only if the investigation was agreed to first by the Ukrainians

Viator abgog67 Oct 27, 2019

Usually you don't mouth 'quid pro quo' before doing it. Just like no thief announces 'I rob you' before robbing.

Microsoft CeAE87 Oct 27, 2019

https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/oct/27/charles-kupperman-lawsuit-asks-judge-decide-trump-/ I mean, if there was nothing to hide, why would you need to ask this? 😆😆

Microsoft 🌲fiddy Oct 27, 2019

There was obviously a quid pro quo, but because no one said the words "quid pro quo" at the time, there was no actual quid pro quo. Also the Chief of Staff said they do stuff like this all the time so it's not a big deal. Get over it.

Amazon SDE III Oct 27, 2019

Lol good one.

Amazon Strong☕️ Oct 27, 2019

Get over it? It’s a federal crime and he will have to be held accountable.

Amazon sako OP Oct 27, 2019

I can see the T-Tards have gone quiet. Furiously reloading Twitter trying to find out what their talking point should be I guess.

Zume worstjobev Oct 27, 2019

Don’t call people t-ards.

Amazon sako OP Oct 27, 2019

Did I hurt your feelings, snowflake?

Instasize cplus Oct 27, 2019

Great, when can we see the full transcripts?

Microsoft 🌲fiddy Oct 27, 2019

Lol I don't understand the endgame of attacking the transparency. Obviously all of this stuff will come out in the next phase during the impeachment trial. Then what will you say?

Amazon sako OP Oct 27, 2019

When the investigation wraps up and the evidence is presented, just exactly the same as when the Republicans tried to impeach Clinton. They also had over 250 closed door depositions before the public part of the process.